Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

09:57
System for Efficacy and Cytotoxicity Screening of Inhibitors Targeting Intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Published on: April 5, 2017
9.0K
dUMP/F-dUMP Binding to Thymidylate Synthase: Human Versus Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Kumar Gaurav1, Tiasha Adhikary1, Priyadarshi Satpati1
1Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati 781039, Assam, India.
ACS Omega
|July 28, 2020
Summary
Computer simulations reveal differences in how Mycobacterium tuberculosis thymidylate synthase (MtbThyX) and human thymidylate synthase (hThyA) bind substrates and inhibitors. MtbThyX shows less selectivity between dUMP and F-dUMP compared to hThyA.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Structural Biology
- Computational Biology
Background:
- Thymidylate synthase is crucial for DNA synthesis, making it a target for tuberculosis drugs.
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis thymidylate synthase (MtbThyX) differs structurally from human thymidylate synthase (hThyA).
- Current inhibitors like Fluorodeoxyuridylate (F-dUMP) lack selectivity, highlighting the need for better drug design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To understand the atomic-level dynamics and energetics of substrate/inhibitor binding to MtbThyX and hThyA.
- To quantitatively estimate ligand selectivity between deoxyuridine monophosphate (dUMP) and F-dUMP for both enzymes.
- To provide insights for designing novel, selective thymidylate synthase inhibitors.
Main Methods:
- Utilized extensive computer simulations (approximately 4.5 μs) based on experimentally determined protein-ligand complex structures.
- Analyzed ligand binding preferences and energetics for MtbThyX and hThyA with dUMP and F-dUMP.
- Investigated the structural features, such as the ligand-binding pocket environment and specific amino acid residues, influencing selectivity.
Main Results:
- MtbThyX prefers the deprotonated (enolate) form of dUMP, while hThyA binds the keto form.
- Computed energetics indicate MtbThyX exhibits lower selectivity between dUMP and F-dUMP, favoring F-dUMP over hThyA.
- Tyrosine at position 135 (Y135) in hThyA plays a key role in enhancing selectivity; MtbThyX has a dry binding pocket, unlike the wetter pocket of hThyA.
Conclusions:
- The distinct binding mechanisms and energetics of MtbThyX and hThyA offer opportunities for developing selective inhibitors.
- Understanding the role of specific residues like Y135 and the nature of the binding pocket (dry vs. wet) is critical for rational drug design.
- Targeting MtbThyX with selective inhibitors could lead to more effective treatments for tuberculosis.

