Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
Transcatheter and Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Outcomes for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure
Talha Mubashir1, Julius Balogh1, Rabail Chaudhry2
1Department of Anesthesiology, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UT Health), Houston, TX.
Insights
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) shows similar in-hospital mortality to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in chronic heart failure patients. TAVR offers reduced complications, shorter stays, and lower costs, suggesting it may be a safer option.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) and chronic heart failure (CHF) represent significant comorbidities.
- Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) are primary treatment options for symptomatic AS.
- Comparative outcomes between TAVR and SAVR in CHF patients require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare in-hospital outcomes of TAVR versus SAVR in patients with concomitant CHF and AS.
- To identify high-risk patient groups associated with adverse outcomes in both TAVR and SAVR procedures.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAVR as an alternative to SAVR in this complex patient population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (January 2012–September 2015).
- Inclusion of adult patients diagnosed with both CHF and AS who underwent either TAVR or SAVR.
- Comparison of in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, length of stay, and total costs between the two intervention groups.
Main Results:
- A total of 5,871 TAVR and 4,008 SAVR procedures were analyzed.
- TAVR patients were older, more frequently female, and presented with a higher comorbidity burden.
- No significant difference in in-hospital mortality was observed; however, SAVR was associated with a longer length of stay (3.5 days longer) and higher total costs. Postoperative complications, excluding complete heart block, permanent pacemaker implantation, and vascular complications, were more frequent in the SAVR group. Multivariate analysis identified age ≥75 years and vascular complications as mortality predictors for TAVR, while cardiac, respiratory, and renal complications predicted mortality in both groups.
Conclusions:
- TAVR demonstrates comparable in-hospital mortality to SAVR in CHF patients with symptomatic AS, despite a higher comorbidity burden.
- TAVR is associated with a lower risk of major postoperative complications and potentially reduced hospital stay and costs.
- TAVR may represent a safer and more cost-effective treatment option for patients with CHF and symptomatic AS.
Objectives:
To determine in-hospital outcomes and assess high-risk groups among chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with aortic stenosis (AS) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Design:
A retrospective analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from January 2012 to September 2015 was performed.
Setting:
Hospitals across the United States that offer TAVRs or SAVRs.
Participants:
Adults with a diagnosis of CHF and AS.
Interventions:
The patients underwent either TAVR or SAVR.
Measurements And Main Results:
Totals of 5,871 and 4,008 CHF patients underwent TAVR and SAVR, respectively. TAVR patients were significantly older, more were female, and had a higher comorbidity burden. No significant differences in in-hospital mortality were noted between TAVR and SAVR. However, mean length of stay was significantly longer by 3.5 days in the SAVR group, as was the mean total cost. With the exception of complete heart block, permanent pacemaker implantation, and vascular complications, the majority of postoperative events were higher among the SAVR group. Multivariate regression analysis identified postoperative cardiac, respiratory and renal complications as significant predictors of in-hospital mortality for both groups. Additionally, age ≥75 years and vascular complications were significant predictors of mortality for patients undergoing TAVR.
Conclusions:
Among CHF patients with symptomatic AS, TAVR had similar in-hospital mortality rate compared with SAVR despite higher comorbidity burden. TAVR patients are at a lower risk of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications and might lead to reduced length of hospital stay and cost. Hence, TAVR may be a safer option in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management

