Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
Published on: April 11, 2016
Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast
Yi-Zhou Jiang1,2, Yin Liu1,2, Yi Xiao1,2
1Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center; Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer in Shanghai, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Abstract:
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtyping may result in improved diagnostic precision and targeted therapies. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we conducted the FUTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03805399), a phase Ib/II subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided umbrella trial, to evaluate the efficacy of these targets. Patients with refractory metastatic TNBC were enrolled and stratified by TNBC subtypes and genomic biomarkers, and assigned to one of these seven arms: (A) pyrotinib with capecitabine, (B) androgen receptor inhibitor with CDK4/6 inhibitor, (C) anti PD-1 with nab-paclitaxel, (D) PARP inhibitor included, (E) and (F) anti-VEGFR included, or (G) mTOR inhibitor with nab-paclitaxel. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). We enrolled 69 refractory metastatic TNBC patients with a median of three previous lines of therapy (range, 1-8). Objective response was achieved in 20 (29.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.7%-41.2%) of the 69 intention-to-treat (ITT) patients. Our results showed that immunotherapy (arm C), in particular, achieved the highest ORR (52.6%, 95% CI: 28.9%-75.6%) in the ITT population. Arm E demonstrated favorable ORR (26.1%, 95% CI: 10.2%-48.4% in the ITT population) but with more high grade (≥ 3) adverse events. Somatic mutations of TOP2A and CD8 immunohistochemical score may have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC. In conclusion, the phase Ib/II FUTURE trial suggested a new concept for TNBC treatment, demonstrating the clinical benefit of subtyping-based targeted therapy for refractory metastatic TNBC.
Insights
The FUTURE trial demonstrated that subtyping triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and using targeted therapies improved treatment outcomes. Immunotherapy showed the highest response rate in refractory metastatic TNBC patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Translational Research
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease requiring precise diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.
- Previous research classified TNBC into four subtypes with identified therapeutic targets.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of subtype-specific targeted therapies in patients with refractory metastatic TNBC.
- To assess the clinical benefit of a subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided treatment approach.
Main Methods:
- The FUTURE trial (NCT03805399) was a phase Ib/II umbrella trial enrolling 69 patients with refractory metastatic TNBC.
- Patients were stratified by TNBC subtype and genomic biomarkers, receiving one of seven targeted treatment arms.
- The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR).
Main Results:
- An overall objective response rate (ORR) of 29.0% was observed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population.
- Immunotherapy (arm C) demonstrated the highest ORR (52.6%) in the ITT population.
- Somatic mutations in TOP2A and CD8 scores may predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype.
Conclusions:
- The FUTURE trial suggests a novel subtyping-based treatment paradigm for refractory metastatic TNBC.
- Targeted therapies guided by molecular subtypes and genomic biomarkers show clinical benefit.
- Immunotherapy emerged as a highly effective strategy for a subset of TNBC patients.
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy

