Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.8K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.8K
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test01:09

Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test

4.5K
The t-test is a statistical method used to compare the sample mean with a population mean or compare two means from two data sets. The test statistic is calculated from the standard deviation, mean, and number of measurements in the data set at a selected confidence interval and then compared to a table of critical values at this confidence level. If the test statistic is smaller than the critical value, the null hypothesis is accepted. In this case, we state that the difference between the...
4.5K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

467
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
467
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

3.9K
One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
3.9K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

726
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
726
Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test01:09

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: Student t-Test and Goodness-of-Fit Test

4.7K
In parametric statistics, two fundamental tests stand out for their utility and wide application: the Student's t-test and goodness-of-fit tests. These tests provide researchers with a robust method for drawing insights from data, testing hypotheses, and making informed decisions based on their findings.
The Student's t-test is a statistical test that examines if there is a statistically significant difference between the means of two groups. This test is instrumental when dealing with...
4.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Artificial intelligence in clinical trial participant recruitment and retention: A scoping review and meta-analysis.

Journal of clinical and translational science·2026
Same author

Psychotherapy, Antidepressants, and Combined Treatment for Depression: A Network Meta-analysis on Social Functioning Outcomes.

Psychotherapy and psychosomatics·2026
Same author

Comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological treatments for rapid tranquilisation in emergency settings: a systematic review and individual participant data network meta-analysis.

The lancet. Psychiatry·2026
Same author

The GALENOS approach to triangulating evidence: a structured approach for integrating information from human and animal studies.

BMC medical research methodology·2026
Same author

Cardiovascular Disease Risk and Noncardiovascular Chronic Disease Burden by Housing Status.

Journal of the American Heart Association·2026
Same author

Phenome-wide analysis of downstream health outcomes following second-line antidiabetic agent prescriptions in All of Us.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1000

Testing small study effects in multivariate meta-analysis.

Chuan Hong1, Georgia Salanti2, Sally C Morton3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Biometrics
|July 29, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Small study effects can bias systematic reviews. This study introduces a new score test to detect these effects in multivariate meta-analysis, improving review validity.

Keywords:
comparative effectiveness researchcomposite likelihoodoutcome reporting biaspublication biassmall study effectsystematic review

More Related Videos

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1000
The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

6.2K
Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data
06:35

Basics of Multivariate Analysis in Neuroimaging Data

Published on: July 24, 2010

17.2K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Small study effects, where smaller studies yield larger treatment effects, can compromise systematic reviews.
  • Existing methods primarily address small study effects in univariate meta-analyses.
  • Detecting these effects in multivariate meta-analysis is an underexplored but critical area.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate a novel score test for detecting small study effects in multivariate meta-analysis.
  • To address the complexities of selection bias in multivariate outcome reporting.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a score test specifically for multivariate meta-analysis.
  • Application of the test in two detailed case studies, comparing it with univariate approaches.
  • Simulation studies to assess the test's Type I error rates and power.
  • Evaluation of the proposed test against naive univariate methods using 44 Cochrane Database systematic reviews.

Main Results:

  • The proposed score test effectively detects small study effects in multivariate settings.
  • Simulation studies confirmed the test maintains nominal Type I error rates and shows good power.
  • Case studies demonstrated the advantages over naive univariate test applications.
  • Analysis of Cochrane reviews showed varying concordance between the proposed and univariate methods.

Conclusions:

  • The developed score test offers a robust method for identifying small study effects in multivariate meta-analysis.
  • This advancement is crucial for enhancing the reliability of systematic reviews involving multiple outcomes.
  • The findings provide a valuable tool for researchers aiming for more accurate meta-analytic conclusions.