Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025
In situ Compressive Loading and Correlative Noninvasive Imaging of the Bone-periodontal Ligament-tooth Fibrous Joint
Published on: March 7, 2014
In Vivo Strain Alterations in Mandibular Molars after Root Canal Treatment Procedures
Prameet Ramachandran1, Angambakkam Rajasekaran PradeepKumar1, Periasamy Ravishankar1
1Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Thai Moogambigai Dental College and Hospital, Dr. MGR Educational and Research Institute, Chennai, India.
Introduction:
The aim of this investigation was to determine the coronal strain variations in mandibular molars under an in vivo bite load after root canal treatment procedures.
Methods:
The coronal strain in carious mandibular first molars with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (experimental group) was compared with that of intact contralateral teeth (control group) in patients 20-40 years old. Experiments were conducted in 2 stages. In stage 1, the maximum bite force on the first molar region was determined on the experimental and control teeth using a customized load cell. In stage 2, strain gauges were bonded to the buccal aspect of teeth, and the strain was recorded after the application of a bite load on the intact (control) teeth; and the experimental teeth before and after endodontic access cavity preparation, cleaning/shaping procedures, root filling, and composite core restoration.
Results:
The mean maximum bite force on the experimental teeth (91 ± 48 N) and the contralateral control teeth (91 ± 49 N) was not significantly different (P = .989). The preoperative strain (microstrain) in the experimental teeth was significantly higher (125 ± 36, P = .001) than in the contralateral intact teeth (46 ± 17). Access cavity preparation significantly increased the strain (327 ± 98, P = .019) on the experimental teeth compared with the preoperative strain. Cleaning/shaping (355 ± 113) and root filling (346 ± 89) did not significantly increase (P = 1.00) the strain compared with the strain determined after endodontic cavity preparation. Composite core restoration in the experimental teeth (106 ± 41) resulted in a significant reduction in the strain compared with the values recorded after an endodontic access cavity (P = .002) and was similar to the preoperative strain values (P = 1.00) but was significantly higher than the strain values in contralateral intact teeth (P = .001).
Conclusions:
The coronal strain on the buccal surface of mandibular first molars significantly increased with access cavity preparation, which did not increase further after cleaning/shaping or root filling. A significant reduction in the strain induced by root canal treatment steps was evident after composite core restoration.
