Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

A Modified Sonographic Algorithm for Image Acquisition in Life-Threatening Emergencies in the Critically Ill Newborn
Published on: April 7, 2023
Critical procedure performance in pediatric patients: Results from a national emergency medicine group
Jestin N Carlson1, Mark S Zocchi2, Coburn Allen3
1US Acute Care Solutions, Canton, OH, United States of America; Department of Emergency Medicine, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America.
Insights
Emergency physicians rarely perform critical pediatric procedures, especially in general and freestanding emergency departments (EDs). This scarcity impacts ED readiness for pediatric emergencies.
Area of Science:
- Emergency Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
- Healthcare Quality
Background:
- Pediatric critical procedures are essential interventions in emergency care.
- Understanding the frequency of these procedures is vital for assessing emergency department (ED) readiness.
- Variations in procedure performance across different ED settings are not well-characterized.
Purpose of the Study:
- To examine the frequency of pediatric critical procedures performed by emergency physicians nationally.
- To compare the rates of these procedures in general EDs, pediatric EDs, and freestanding EDs/urgent care centers.
- To identify potential disparities in procedural experience among emergency physicians.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of an administrative billing and coding dataset (2014-2018).
- Inclusion of pediatric patients (<18 years).
- Focus on critical procedures: endotracheal intubation, electrical cardioversion, central venous placement, intraosseous access, and chest tube insertion.
Main Results:
- A total of 2233 pediatric critical procedures were performed by 2290 emergency physicians across 186 EDs.
- A significant proportion of physicians in general EDs (53.9%) and freestanding EDs/urgent cares (89%) performed zero pediatric procedures annually.
- Physicians in pediatric EDs performed significantly more pediatric critical procedures per 1000 ED visits (0.68) and per 1000 clinical hours (1.66) compared to those in general EDs (0.12 and 0.26, respectively).
Conclusions:
- Pediatric critical procedures are infrequently performed by emergency physicians, particularly in general and freestanding EDs.
- The low frequency of these procedures raises concerns about emergency physician proficiency and overall ED pediatric readiness.
- Targeted training and resource allocation may be necessary to improve pediatric critical care capabilities in non-pediatric ED settings.
Study Objective:
We sought to examine the frequency of pediatric critical procedures performed in a national group of emergency physicians.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of an administrative billing and coding dataset for procedural performance documentation verification from 2014 to 2018. We describe and compare incident rates of pediatric (age <18 years) patient critical procedure performance by emergency physicians in general emergency departments (EDs), pediatric EDs, and freestanding ED/urgent care centers. Critical procedures were endotracheal intubation, electrical cardioversion, central venous placement, intraosseous access, and chest tube insertion.
Results:
Among 2290 emergency physicians working in 186 EDs (1844 working in 129 general EDs, 125 in 8 pediatric EDs, and 321 in 49 freestanding EDs/urgent cares), a total of 2233 pediatric critical procedures were performed during the study period. Many physicians at general EDs and freestanding EDs/urgent cares performed zero pediatric procedures per year (53.9% and 89% respectively). Per 1000 ED visits seen (All patient ages), physicians working in general EDs performed fewer pediatric critical procedures than physicians in pediatric EDs (0.12/1000 visits vs 0.68/1000 visits; rate difference = 0.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.61). Per 1000 clinical hours worked, physicians working in general EDs performed 0.26 procedures compared to 1.66 for physicians in pediatric EDs (rate difference = 1.39; 95% CI 1.27-1.52).
Conclusion:
Pediatric critical procedures are rarely performed by emergency physicians and are exceedingly rare in general EDs and freestanding EDs/urgent cares. The rarity of performance of these skills has implications for ED pediatric readiness.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management

