Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Closed Chest Biventricular Pressure-Volume Loop Recordings with Admittance Catheters in a Porcine Model
Published on: May 18, 2021
External Loop Recorders: Primary Care Placement Is Noninferior to Hospital-Based Cardiac Unit
Kara J Callum1, Lynn Hall1, Sharon Jack1
1NHS Highland, Raigmore Hospital, Inverness, UK.
Insights
Primary care external loop recorders (ELRs) detect arrhythmias as effectively as hospital-based ones. Shorter wear times in primary care did not impact diagnostic yield, improving local access to cardiac monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Primary Care Medicine
- Medical Device Technology
Background:
- External loop recorders (ELRs) are crucial for diagnosing syncope and palpitations.
- Comparing arrhythmia detection rates between primary care (PC) and hospital-based cardiac unit (HBCU) settings is important for optimizing patient care.
- Understanding the impact of ELR fitting location on diagnostic yield and patient access is essential.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the rates of arrhythmia detection between ELRs fitted in primary care and hospital-based cardiac units.
- To evaluate if ELR wear time and diagnostic yield differ based on the fitting location.
- To explore the relationship between ELR placement, geographical factors, and proximity to specialist centers.
Main Methods:
- A comparative study analyzing 560 external loop recorder (ELR) recordings from January to December 2015.
- Patients were stratified into two groups: those who had ELRs fitted in primary care (PC) versus a hospital-based cardiac unit (HBCU).
- Data on baseline characteristics, indications for ELR use, wear time, and arrhythmia detection were collected and analyzed by cardiac physiologists.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in arrhythmia detection rates was found between PC-fitted (16.2%) and HBCU-fitted (21.7%) ELRs (P = .28).
- Patients in the PC group wore ELRs for a shorter median duration (7 days vs. 14 days; P < .0001) without compromising diagnostic yield.
- ELR placement in PC was more frequent in remote rural areas and correlated with increased distance from the HBCU (r = 0.39; P = .04).
Conclusions:
- External loop recorders fitted in primary care demonstrate comparable arrhythmia detection efficacy to those fitted in hospital-based cardiac units.
- Suitability trained primary care staff can effectively manage ELR fitting, reducing the need for hospital visits.
- Increased use of ELRs in remote areas suggests improved local access to arrhythmia detection services, particularly benefiting patients distant from specialist centers.
Abstract:
Introduction: External loop recorders (ELRs) are recommended for the investigation of syncope and palpitations. This study aimed to compare rates of arrhythmia detection between primary care (PC) and hospital-based cardiac unit (HBCU) fitted ELRs. Methods: Data were captured from January to December 2015. Twenty-eight general practitioner practices and 1 hospital took part. Patients were divided into those with ELR fitted in PC or HBCU. All ELR data were analyzed by a cardiac physiologist. Results: A total of 560 ELR recordings were analyzed; 219 (PC) versus 341 (HBCU). There was no difference between the baseline characteristics (all Ps > .05). The predominant indication for ELR in each group were palpitations; between-group variation was observed for syncope (P = .0004). There were no significant between-group differences in the number of recordings per patient; however, PC group wore the ELR for less time (median 7 days vs median 14 days; P < .0001). There were no differences in arrhythmia detection between PC- and HBCU-fitted ELRs (16.2% [n = 39] vs 21.7% [n = 74], respectively; P = .28). PC placement of ELRs was highest in very remote rural communities (P = .005) and correlated with distance from HBCU (r = 0.39; P = .04). Conclusions: This study showed no difference in detection of arrhythmias between PC and HBCU fitted ELRs. This suggests adequate ELR recording can be completed by suitably trained staff in PC. Furthermore, ELRs were fitted for less time in PC without an adverse effect on diagnostic yield. ELR usage increased with increasing distance from the specialist center and rurality suggesting improved local access to arrhythmia detection services.
Related Concept Videos
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Holter Monitor: 24-Hour Monitoring
Secondary Healthcare System
Types of Records I: Unit and Nurses Records
Unit records can be divided into two main types: administrative records and clinical records.
Administrative records in...
Cardiac Catheterization III: Left Heart Catheterization
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management

