Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: Hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary

Craig Basman1, Jonathan M Hemli2, Michael C Kim1

  • 1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital/Northwell Health, New York, New York.

Insights

Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) offers similar 8-year survival for triple-vessel disease (TVD) patients compared to traditional bypass surgery or stenting. This approach is a viable option for select TVD patients, especially when a low residual SYNTAX score is achieved.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Cardiac Surgery

Background:

  • Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) involves grafting the left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery combined with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for other lesions.
  • This strategy is infrequently used for complex multivessel disease.
  • The study compares HCR to traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and multivessel PCI for triple-vessel disease (TVD).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the 8-year survival rates of patients with TVD treated with HCR.
  • To compare HCR outcomes against matched cohorts undergoing traditional CABG or multivessel PCI.
  • To assess long-term major adverse cardiovascular events in TVD patients treated with HCR versus CABG or multivessel PCI.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 4805 TVD patients from January 2009 to December 2016.
  • Propensity-matched analysis of 100 HCR patients against CABG or multivessel PCI cohorts.
  • Primary endpoint: all-cause mortality at 8 years; secondary endpoint: composite of death, repeat revascularization, and myocardial infarction.

Main Results:

  • Similar 8-year mortality rates observed: HCR (5.0%), CABG (4.0%), and multivessel PCI (9.0%).
  • No significant difference in the composite endpoint of death, repeat revascularization, or myocardial infarction between groups.
  • HCR achieved a lower residual SYNTAX score compared to multivessel PCI, despite a higher baseline SYNTAX score.

Conclusions:

  • HCR demonstrates comparable long-term survival and freedom from major adverse cardiovascular events to traditional CABG and multivessel PCI in select TVD patients.
  • HCR should be considered for patients with multivessel disease when a low residual SYNTAX score is achievable.
  • The findings support HCR as a valuable treatment option for specific complex coronary artery disease cases.
Abstract