Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026
Subcutaneous Infection of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus MRSA
Published on: February 9, 2011
From the MJM Editors' Desk: Common errors authors make in submission to the Medical Journal of Malaysia
L Rampal1, B S Liew2, P Oothuman3
1College of Public Health Medicine, Academy of Medicine Malaysia, Malaysia. dr_rampal1@hotmail.com.
Abstract:
Proper understanding the 'Instructions to authors' for a particular journal is the key towards successful submission of a manuscript which will lead to it being published. Common errors that are frequently made by authors in their submission to the Malaysia Journal of Malaysia (MJM) that lead to rejection of their submission or requiring major revisions or minor revisions are listed and discussed in this article. Outright rejection prior to even a peer review process may be made for an article due to: it is poorly written or when there is suspicion on the authenticity of the submission, which contains elements that are suspected to be plagiarised, it is a duplicate submission or not in the format required by the MJM. The editor in charge of the issue makes a recommendation to the Editor in Chief for the final decision.
Insights
Understanding journal submission guidelines is crucial for authors. This article details common errors leading to manuscript rejection by the Malaysia Journal of Malaysia (MJM).
Area of Science:
- Scientific Publishing
- Manuscript Submission
- Academic Integrity
Background:
- Adherence to 'Instructions to Authors' is vital for manuscript acceptance.
- The Malaysia Journal of Malaysia (MJM) outlines specific formatting and content requirements.
- Authors frequently make errors that lead to manuscript rejection or revisions.
Discussion:
- Manuscripts may face outright rejection before peer review if poorly written.
- Suspected plagiarism, duplicate submissions, or non-compliance with MJM format are grounds for rejection.
- The editorial team reviews submissions, with the Editor-in-Chief making the final decision.
Key Insights:
- Common submission errors include poor writing quality and lack of adherence to journal standards.
- Plagiarism and duplicate submissions are critical issues leading to immediate rejection.
- Understanding and following MJM's specific author instructions can prevent common pitfalls.
Outlook:
- Improving author awareness of submission guidelines can reduce rejection rates.
- Strict adherence to academic integrity policies, including originality, is paramount.
- Streamlined submission processes benefit both authors and journal editors.
Related Concept Videos
01:43Proofreading
01:36Mismatch Repair
01:20Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
01:25Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
01:30Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...