Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025
Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Small-Group Training in Teaching Medical Students Integral Clinical Eye Examination
John Y Lee1, Ryan A Gallo1, Chrisfouad R Alabiad1
1Department of Ophthalmology, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.
Objective:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of an interactive, small-group ophthalmology clinical training session by assessing medical students' self-confidence with eye examination skills and long-term retention of direct ophthalmoscopy skills.
Methods:
The second-year medical students participated in a one-time small-group clinical training session that taught essential components of the eye examination. Students reported their confidence with each component in pre- and postsession surveys. Eight months later, direct ophthalmoscopy skills were reassessed by having students visualize the optic nerves of standardized patients and identify the matching optic nerve photograph in a multiple-choice quiz.
Results:
Among 197 second-year medical students who participated in the training session, 172 students completed the presession survey (87.3% response rate) and 108 students completed the postsession survey (54.8% response rate). Following the training session, students reported increased self-confidence (p < 0.01) overall. A total of 107 (107/108; 99.1%) students reported that they visualized the optic nerve head, and 80 out of 85 (94.1%) students stated that they preferred the PanOptic ophthalmoscope over the traditional direct ophthalmoscope. Students reported greater self-confidence using the PanOptic ophthalmoscope (p < 0.01). In the 8-month follow-up assessment, 42 medical students (42/197; 21.3%) completed the exercise. A total of 41 (41/42; 97.6%) students stated that they saw the optic nerve with the PanOptic ophthalmoscope; 24 (24/42; 57.1%) students identified the correct optic nerve image using the PanOptic ophthalmoscope on a standardized patient; 14 (14/42; 33.3%) students stated that they saw the optic nerve with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope; and 4 (4/42; 9.1%) students from the same cohort identified the correct optic nerve image with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope on a standardized patient.
Conclusion:
Our comprehensive, one-time eye examination skills training session seeks to prepare students to incorporate these skills in future patient care. Students' overall confidence improved in each aspect of the eye examination that was covered. A follow-up assessment on students' direct ophthalmoscopy skills suggests that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope allows for superior skills retention as compared with the traditional direct ophthalmoscope. We believe that the PanOptic ophthalmoscope should be further integrated into medical education and clinical practice.
