Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

541
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
541
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic01:25

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

7.6K
In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the...
7.6K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

7.3K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
7.3K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

736
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
736
The Availability Heuristic01:08

The Availability Heuristic

6.8K
A heuristic is a general problem-solving framework (Tversky & Kahneman, 1974). You can think of these as mental shortcuts that are used to solve problems. Different types of heuristics are used in different types of situations, and the impulse to use a heuristic occurs when one of five conditions is met (Pratkanis, 1989):
6.8K
Parallel Processing01:20

Parallel Processing

498
The brain processes sensory information rapidly due to parallel processing, which involves sending data across multiple neural pathways at the same time. This method allows the brain to manage various sensory qualities, such as shapes, colors, movements, and locations, all concurrently. For instance, when observing a forest landscape, the brain simultaneously processes the movement of leaves, the shapes of trees, the depth between them, and the various shades of green. This enables a quick and...
498

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Modeling Gliding-based Target Selection for Blind Touchscreen Users.

MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)·2023
Same author

A Review of Occlusion as a Tool to Assess Attentional Demand in Driving.

Human factors·2021
Same author

Network Entropy for the Sequence Analysis of Functional Connectivity Graphs of the Brain.

Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)·2020
Same author

On the Difference Between Necessary and Unnecessary Glances Away From the Forward Roadway: An Occlusion Study on the Motorway.

Human factors·2019
Same author

Parameter Inference for Computational Cognitive Models with Approximate Bayesian Computation.

Cognitive science·2019
Same author

Towards Perceptual Optimization of the Visual Design of Scatterplots.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2017
Same journal

Compatibility Effects With Simple Lever Tools: A Replication and Extension Beyond Simple Button Responses.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Effects of Egocentric and Exocentric Supervisor Viewpoint Perspectives on Motion Plan Legibility and Decision Support in Automated Spacecraft Docking Maneuvers.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

System-Wide Trust (SWT) Versus Component-Specific Trust (CST) in Multi-Agent Human-Agent Teams: Individual Variability in Trust Bias.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Driver Adaptation to Partially Automated Driving in Urban Environments: Effects of Repeated Exposure and System Capabilities on Drivers' Trust, Monitoring, and Response.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Modeling Human Expertise in a Sanding Task.

Human factors·2026
Same journal

Towards Safe and Comfortable Vehicle Control Transitions: A Systematic Review of Takeover Time, Time Budget, and Takeover Outcomes.

Human factors·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.9K

Multitasking in Driving as Optimal Adaptation Under Uncertainty.

Jussi P P Jokinen1, Tuomo Kujala2, Antti Oulasvirta1,3

  • 1174277 Aalto University, Finland.

Human Factors
|August 1, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Drivers adapt multitasking behavior to changing driving conditions. This study models how cognitive mechanisms and risk beliefs influence safe versus unsafe driving, offering insights into driver adaptation strategies.

Keywords:
computational rationalitydrivingmultitaskingreinforcement learningtask interleaving

More Related Videos

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.8K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors
07:25

Driving Under the Influence: How Music Listening Affects Driving Behaviors

Published on: March 27, 2019

12.9K
Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research
07:15

Tactile Vibrating Toolkit and Driving Simulation Platform for Driving-Related Research

Published on: December 18, 2020

4.8K
Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
07:48

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing

Published on: April 4, 2025

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Transportation Safety

Background:

  • Driver multitasking strategies adapt to environmental changes, but underlying cognitive mechanisms remain unclear.
  • A unified model is needed to explain how task constraints, goals, cognitive abilities, and risk perceptions influence driving behavior.
  • Understanding these factors is crucial for developing safer driving systems and interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To understand how drivers adapt multitasking behavior to changing driving conditions.
  • To investigate the cognitive mechanisms underlying the emergence of safe versus unsafe driving behaviors.
  • To develop a computational model explaining driver attention allocation during multitasking.

Main Methods:

  • Modeled driver visual attention deployment as a stochastic sequential decision-making problem.
  • Utilized hierarchical reinforcement learning for a computationally tractable solution.
  • Compared model simulations against human data from a driving simulator study.

Main Results:

  • Human data demonstrated adaptation to attentional demands, evidenced by lane deviation and gaze patterns.
  • The proposed computational model accurately predicted human adaptation metrics.
  • Model simulations align with observed human multitasking behavior in driving.

Conclusions:

  • Driver multitasking strategies represent optimal adaptation under uncertainty, balancing cognitive constraints and environmental risks.
  • Safe and unsafe driving behaviors emerge from arbitrating conflicting goals and managing uncertainty.
  • Computational models can predict conditions conducive to unsafe driving behavior.