Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Rapid Screening of HIV Reverse Transcriptase and Integrase Inhibitors
Published on: April 9, 2014
Patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving treatment with direct acting antivirals: How is this population changing?
Andrea Lombardi1, Marta Colaneri2, Kesav Aditya Vijayagopal2
1Infectious Diseases I Unit, IRCCS "San Matteo", Via Taramelli 5, 27100 Pavia, Italy; Infectious Diseases I Unit, IRCCS "San Matteo", Pavia, Italy.
Insights
Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have transformed hepatitis C treatment. Patients receiving DAAs are older with more comorbidities, but sustained virological response (SVR) rates remain high.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacotherapy
Background:
- Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment.
- Understanding evolving patient demographics and treatment outcomes is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze changes in patient characteristics and sustained virological response (SVR) rates among CHC patients treated with DAAs over time.
- To assess the impact of demographic and clinical shifts on treatment efficacy.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 2565 CHC patients treated with DAAs from 2015 onwards.
- Stratification of demographic, clinical, and virological characteristics and SVR rates by treatment year.
Main Results:
- Patient population aged significantly (59.8 to 62.2 years) and showed increased comorbidities (p<0.001).
- Proportion of men and cirrhotic patients decreased, while foreign-born patient numbers trended upward.
- Sustained virological response (SVR) rates significantly increased from 93.4% in 2015 to 97.1% in 2018 (p<0.05).
Conclusions:
- The CHC patient cohort receiving DAAs is aging and presenting with more comorbidities.
- Despite these changes, high SVR rates were maintained, indicating the continued effectiveness of DAAs.
Background And Aims:
Direct acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized the landscape of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) enabling treatment of all those infected. It remains to be determined how the characteristics of those receiving treatment are changing.
Materials And Methods:
We retrospectively analysed all the patients with CHC who received treatment with DAAs in a large referral centre since 01/01/2015. We stratified their demographic, clinical and virological characteristics at baseline and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates according to the year of treatment.
Results:
In the study were included 2565 patients. During the study period, the yearly proportion of men and cirrhotic patients decreased (p<0.001) whereas mean age increased from 59.8 to 62.2 years old (p=0.04). An increasing trend was observed in the foreign-born patients from 4.3% to 7.9%, without reaching statistical significance. The prevalence of comorbidities had also increased during the study period (p<0.001). Instead, the yearly number of experienced patients decreased significantly (p<0.001) as well as the mean MELD score of cirrhotic patients from 9 to 7.6 (p<0.001). SVR rates increased significantly, from 93.4% in 2015 to 97.1% in 2018 (P<0.05).
Conclusions:
The population of patients with CHC receiving DAAs is becoming older and with more comorbidities. Nevertheless, this did not impact SVR rates.
More Related Videos
10:25"Liver-on-a-Chip" Cultures of Primary Hepatocytes and Kupffer Cells for Hepatitis B Virus Infection
Published on: February 19, 2019
06:28Immunofluorescence to Monitor the Cellular Uptake of Human Lactoferrin and its Associated Antiviral Activity Against the Hepatitis C Virus
Published on: October 1, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Drug Dosing and Hepatic Blood Flow
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Dose Adjustments Due to Hepatic Impairment
Retrovirus Life Cycles
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Active Drug, Metabolite and Fraction of Metabolized Drug
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors