Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Adapted Resistance Training Improves Strength in Eight Weeks in Individuals with Multiple Sclerosis
Published on: January 29, 2016
Effectiveness of a 2-Week Strength Training Learning Intervention on Self-selected Weight-Training Intensity
Stephen C Glass1, Sabrina Ahmad, Taylor Gabler
1Department of Movement Science, Human Performance Laboratory, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan.
A 2-week strength training program effectively increased self-selected (SS) resistance training intensity to over 60% one repetition maximum (1RM) for both imposed (IM) and SS groups. No significant differences were found between the groups post-training.
Area of Science:
- Exercise Physiology
- Sports Science
- Strength and Conditioning
Background:
- Determining optimal training intensity is crucial for strength development.
- Self-selected (SS) training intensity may differ from imposed (IM) intensity protocols.
- Understanding the learning curve of resistance training intensity is important for novice and experienced individuals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of a 2-week strength training intervention on self-selected (SS) resistance training intensity.
- To compare the impact of imposed (IM) versus self-selected (SS) training protocols on subsequent lifting intensity.
- To analyze changes in percentage of one repetition maximum (% 1RM), repetitions, and ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) over the intervention period.
Main Methods:
- 18-40 year old subjects (n=20) underwent a 2-week resistance training program with either imposed (IM) or self-selected (SS) loads.
- Training included chest press, leg press, triceps extension, bicep curl, and shoulder press, with subjects completing 2 sets per machine.
- Loads, repetitions, and RPE were recorded, with IM loads adjusted to achieve approximately 70% 1RM, while SS loads were chosen without feedback.
Main Results:
- Both IM and SS groups achieved mean intensities exceeding 60% 1RM for practiced lifts post-intervention.
- Significant increases in % 1RM were observed from day 1 to day 6 for both IM (57.2% to 74.7%) and SS (47.2% to 66.2%) groups.
- While RPE increased and repetitions decreased across days, no significant post-training differences in SS loads or repetitions were found between IM and SS groups.
Conclusions:
- A 2-week supervised resistance training intervention, regardless of imposed or self-selected intensity, leads to participants selecting loads greater than 60% 1RM.
- The learning effect over 2 weeks allows individuals to appropriately self-select resistance training intensities.
- Further research is needed to explore the long-term effects and transferability of this learned intensity to novel exercises.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
06:13Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
Published on: December 1, 2023