Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Hemocompatibility Testing of Blood-Contacting Implants in a Flow Loop Model Mimicking Human Blood Flow
Published on: March 5, 2020
Comparison of First- and Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and
Yong Hoon Kim1, Ae-Young Her1, Myung Ho Jeong2
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
Insights
Second-generation drug-eluting stents (2G-DES) show improved efficacy over first-generation DES (1G-DES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction and prediabetes. This study found 2G-DES significantly reduced major adverse events compared to 1G-DES.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Diabetes Mellitus Research
Background:
- Prediabetes is linked to increased coronary artery disease risk.
- The comparative effectiveness of first-generation (1G) and second-generation (2G) drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes remains unclear.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes between 1G-DES and 2G-DES in patients with AMI and prediabetes.
- To evaluate the safety and efficacy of different DES generations in this specific patient population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 4997 patients with AMI and prediabetes were analyzed.
- Patients received either 1G-DES (n=726) or 2G-DES (n=4271).
- Propensity score-matching created comparable groups (698 pairs) to assess patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs), including death, recurrent MI, and revascularization, plus stent thrombosis (ST) at 2-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- After PSM, 1G-DES use was associated with significantly higher rates of POCOs (HR: 1.467), any revascularization (HR: 2.259), and stent thrombosis (HR: 4.361) compared to 2G-DES.
- No significant differences were observed in all-cause death, cardiac death, or recurrent MI between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Second-generation DES implantation demonstrates superior efficacy compared to first-generation DES in patients with AMI and prediabetes over a 2-year period.
- Further research is warranted to validate these findings and guide clinical practice.
Objective:
To compare major clinical outcomes after successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with first-generation (1G) drug-eluting stents (DES) and second-generation (2G) DES in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and prediabetes.
Background:
Patients with prediabetes are associated with an increased incidence of coronary artery disease. The relative superiority of 1G- and 2G-DES in these patients is not well established.
Methods:
A total of 4997 patients with AMI and prediabetes were divided into two groups: the 1D-DES group (n = 726) and the 2G-DES group (n = 4271). The primary outcomes were the patient-oriented composite outcomes (POCOs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction (Re-MI), and any disease revascularization at 2-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST).
Results:
After propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis, two PSM groups (698 pairs, n = 1396, C-statistics = 0.725) were generated. The cumulative incidence rates of POCOs (hazard ratio (HR): 1.467; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.068-2.015; p = 0.018), any disease revascularization (HR: 2.259; 95% CI: 1.397-3.654; p = 0.001), and ST (HR: 4.361; 95% CI: 1.243-15.30; p = 0.021) in the 1G-DES group were significantly higher than those in the 2G-DES group. However, the cumulative incidence rates of all-cause death, cardiac death, and Re-MI were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions:
In patients with AMI and prediabetes, 2G-DES implantation was more efficacious than 1G-DES implantation over a 2-year follow-up period. However, further studies are needed to confirm these results.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: α-Glucosidase Inhibitors
Acarbose and miglitol are...
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones

