Integrative Review of Managed Entry Agreements: Chances and Limitations
Carolina Zampirolli Dias1,2, Brian Godman3,4,5,6, Ludmila Peres Gargano1,2
1Graduate Program in Medicines and Pharmaceutical Services, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627. Pampulha, Belo Horizonte, 31270-901, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Background And Objective:
Managed entry agreements (MEAs) consist of a set of instruments to reduce the uncertainty and the budget impact of new high-priced medicines; however, there are concerns. There is a need to critically appraise MEAs with their planned introduction in Brazil. Accordingly, the objective of this article is to identify and appraise key attributes and concerns with MEAs among payers and their advisers, with the findings providing critical considerations for Brazil and other high- and middle-income countries.
Methods:
An integrative review approach was adopted. This involved a review of MEAs across countries. The review question was 'What are the health technology MEAs that have been applied around the world?' This review was supplemented with studies not retrieved in the search known to the senior-level co-authors including key South American markets. It also involved senior-level decision makers and advisers providing guidance on the potential advantages and disadvantages of MEAs and ways forward.
Results:
Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Most MEAs included medicines (96.8%), focused on financial arrangements (43%) and included mostly antineoplastic medicines. Most countries kept key information confidential including discounts or had not published such data. Few details were found in the literature regarding South America. Our findings and inputs resulted in both advantages including reimbursement and disadvantages including concerns with data collection for outcome-based schemes.
Conclusions:
We are likely to see a growth in MEAs with the continual launch of new high-priced and often complex treatments, coupled with increasing demands on resources. Whilst outcome-based MEAs could be an important tool to improve access to new innovative medicines, there are critical issues to address. Comparing knowledge, experiences, and practices across countries is crucial to guide high- and middle-income countries when designing their future MEAs.
Insights
Managed entry agreements (MEAs) help manage costs for new medicines but raise concerns. This review critically appraises MEAs for Brazil, offering insights for other countries.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Pharmaceutical Policy
- Health Technology Assessment
Background:
- Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) are financial instruments to mitigate risks associated with high-priced medicines.
- Concerns exist regarding the implementation and impact of MEAs, necessitating critical appraisal.
- There is a specific need to evaluate MEAs for their planned introduction in Brazil.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify and appraise key attributes and concerns of MEAs.
- To provide critical considerations for the implementation of MEAs in Brazil and similar economies.
- To inform payers and their advisors on the strategic use of MEAs.
Main Methods:
- An integrative review of MEAs globally was conducted.
- The review question focused on the types of health technology MEAs applied worldwide.
- Findings were supplemented with expert knowledge, including insights from South American markets and decision-makers.
Main Results:
- Twenty-five studies were reviewed, predominantly featuring medicines (96.8%), with a focus on financial arrangements (43%).
- Antineoplastic medicines were frequently included in MEAs, and data confidentiality was common.
- Advantages like improved reimbursement were noted, alongside disadvantages such as data collection challenges for outcome-based schemes.
Conclusions:
- The use of MEAs is expected to grow due to new, high-cost treatments and resource constraints.
- Outcome-based MEAs offer potential for enhancing access to innovative medicines but require careful consideration of critical issues.
- Cross-country comparisons of MEA knowledge and practices are vital for guiding future policy in middle- and high-income countries.
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
Constraints and Statical Determinacy

