Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage can Stall the Cell Cycle

9.8K
In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
9.8K
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle02:36

DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle

2.9K
In response to DNA damage, cells can pause the cell cycle to assess and repair the breaks. However, the cell must check the DNA at certain critical stages during the cell cycle. If the cell cycle pauses before DNA replication, the cells will contain twice the amount of DNA. On the other hand, if cells arrest after DNA replication but before mitosis, they will contain four times the normal amount of DNA. With a host of specialized proteins at their disposal,cells must use the right protein at...
2.9K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:38

Nucleotide Excision Repair

4.7K
DNA Distortion and Damage
Cells are regularly exposed to mutagens—factors in the environment that can damage DNA and generate mutations. UV radiation is one of the most common mutagens and is estimated to introduce a significant number of changes in DNA. These include bends or kinks in the structure, which can block DNA replication or transcription. If these errors are not fixed, the damage can cause mutations, which in turn can result in cancer or disease depending on which sequences are...
4.7K
Nucleotide Excision Repair01:08

Nucleotide Excision Repair

40.3K
Overview
40.3K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

33.1K
In order to be passed through generations, genomic DNA must be undamaged and error-free. However, every day, DNA in a cell undergoes several thousand to a million damaging events by natural causes and external factors. Ionizing radiation such as UV rays, free radicals produced during cellular respiration, and hydrolytic damage from metabolic reactions can alter the structure of DNA. Damages caused include single-base alteration, base dimerization, chain breaks, and cross-linkage.
Chemically...
33.1K
Overview of DNA Repair02:25

Overview of DNA Repair

9.4K
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Plasticity of mitotic cyclins in promoting the G2-M transition.

The Journal of cell biology·2025
Same author

Mechanism of entecavir-induced reduction of HBV DNA integration.

Antiviral research·2025
Same author

The interplay of the translocase activity and protein recruitment function of PICH in ultrafine anaphase bridge resolution and genomic stability.

Nucleic acids research·2024
Same author

Kinesins regulate the heterogeneity in centrosome clustering after whole-genome duplication.

Life science alliance·2024
Same author

Coregulation of NDC80 Complex Subunits Determines the Fidelity of the Spindle-Assembly Checkpoint and Mitosis.

Molecular cancer research : MCR·2024
Same author

BCL-XL regulates the timing of mitotic apoptosis independently of BCL2 and MCL1 compensation.

Cell death & disease·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Combining Proximity Ligand Assay with Gamma-H2AX Staining to Characterize Protein Interactions in DNA Damage Response
09:39

Author Spotlight: Combining Proximity Ligand Assay with Gamma-H2AX Staining to Characterize Protein Interactions in DNA Damage Response

Published on: August 2, 2024

799

Aurora kinases and DNA damage response.

Hoi Tang Ma1, Randy Y C Poon1

  • 1Division of Life Science, Center for Cancer Research, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Neuroscience, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Hong Kong.

Mutation Research
|August 2, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This review explores how Aurora kinases, proteins typically known for managing cell division, also play significant roles in detecting and repairing genetic damage. The authors discuss how these kinases interact with various checkpoints and repair mechanisms to maintain genomic stability. By understanding these non-mitotic functions, researchers may better utilize kinase inhibitors alongside traditional cancer treatments.

Keywords:
CancerCancer therapiesDNA damage checkpointsDNA repairMitosismitosiscell cycle checkpointscancer therapyp53 pathway

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

10.8K
Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage
10:44

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage

Published on: January 31, 2018

10.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Author Spotlight: Combining Proximity Ligand Assay with Gamma-H2AX Staining to Characterize Protein Interactions in DNA Damage Response
09:39

Author Spotlight: Combining Proximity Ligand Assay with Gamma-H2AX Staining to Characterize Protein Interactions in DNA Damage Response

Published on: August 2, 2024

799
Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence
07:55

Visualization of DNA Repair Proteins Interaction by Immunofluorescence

Published on: June 26, 2020

10.8K
Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage
10:44

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage

Published on: January 31, 2018

10.6K

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology of Aurora kinases in cellular signaling
  • Oncology research focusing on DNA damage response pathways

Background:

No prior work has fully resolved the diverse roles of Aurora kinases beyond their traditional mitotic duties. It was already known that these proteins manage cell division cycles. That uncertainty drove interest in their secondary functions. Prior research has shown that these kinases influence genetic integrity. This gap motivated a closer look at their involvement in cellular stress. Scientists have long suspected these proteins interact with various signaling pathways. That realization prompted investigations into their broader biological impact. Current literature highlights a complex network of interactions involving these kinases.

Purpose Of The Study:

The aim of this review is to synthesize evidence regarding the non-mitotic functions of Aurora kinases in DNA damage response. Researchers sought to address the lack of a comprehensive overview of these secondary roles. This study investigates how these proteins interact with various cell cycle checkpoints. The authors intended to highlight the connection between kinase activity and genetic repair pathways. They explored the implications of kinase dysregulation for genomic integrity. This work addresses the need to understand how cells respond to genetic stress. The authors aimed to provide a rationale for future therapeutic research. This effort clarifies the multifaceted nature of these proteins in cellular biology.

Main Methods:

The authors conducted a comprehensive synthesis of current literature regarding kinase signaling. They evaluated peer-reviewed studies to identify non-mitotic roles of these proteins. This review approach prioritized evidence linking kinases to genetic repair. Investigators categorized findings based on specific cell cycle checkpoints. They analyzed data concerning p53 and p73 pathway interactions. The team examined reports on the synergy between inhibitors and chemotherapeutic agents. This systematic assessment aimed to clarify the breadth of kinase involvement. Researchers focused on summarizing established connections to genomic maintenance.

Main Results:

The strongest finding indicates that these kinases are inextricably linked to pathways guarding against genetic damage. Evidence shows that Aurora kinase A contributes to the G2 checkpoint through PLK1 activation. Both kinases prevent chromosome segregation errors by controlling the abscission checkpoint. Studies confirm that dysregulation triggers damage sensed by a p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint. The literature provides a clear connection between these proteins and apoptotic pathways. Researchers report that these kinases influence the G1 checkpoint via p73 signaling. Data suggests that these proteins are essential for mitigating damage-induced micronuclei formation. The synthesis confirms that these kinases perform a myriad of non-mitotic functions.

Conclusions:

The authors propose that Aurora kinases serve as integral components of genomic stability maintenance. These proteins regulate various checkpoints to prevent errors during cell division. Researchers suggest that targeting these kinases could enhance the efficacy of existing cancer therapies. The evidence supports a synergistic relationship between kinase inhibition and DNA-damaging agents. This synthesis highlights the potential for novel therapeutic strategies in oncology. The authors emphasize that future work must clarify the specific mechanisms of these interactions. These findings provide a framework for understanding how cells manage genetic stress. The review underscores the importance of these kinases in preventing chromosomal instability.

The researchers propose that Aurora kinase A facilitates the G2 checkpoint by regulating PLK1 and CDC25B activation, whereas Aurora kinase B primarily manages the abscission checkpoint to prevent the formation of micronuclei during cell division.

The authors identify the p53 and p73 pathways as the primary mechanisms through which these kinases communicate with the G1 DNA damage checkpoint to ensure cellular integrity.

The authors state that these kinases are necessary to prevent chromosome segregation errors that arise specifically from DNA damage occurring during the mitotic phase.

The researchers utilize existing literature to synthesize evidence regarding how these kinases interact with apoptotic pathways and various DNA repair mechanisms to maintain genomic stability.

The authors observe that dysregulation of these kinases triggers genetic damage that is subsequently detected by a p53-dependent postmitotic checkpoint in the G1 phase.

The researchers propose that combining small-molecule inhibitors of these kinases with traditional DNA-damaging agents offers a promising strategy for improving cancer treatment outcomes.