Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025
Single-stage Dynamic Reanimation of the Smile in Irreversible Facial Paralysis by Free Functional Muscle Transfer
Published on: March 1, 2015
Skin Excursion with Cannula Lipodissection and the Anatomical Implications of Superficial Musculoaponeurotic System
Michael N Mirzabeigi1, Ran Y Stark1, Catherine S Chang1
1From Atlanta Plastic Surgery P.C.; and the Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System.
Background:
The tumescent face lift uses the concept of subcutaneous cannula lipodissection of the neck, as opposed to wide skin undermining. Lipodissection mobilizes soft tissue while preserving perforating neurovascular branches. The purpose of this study is two-fold: (1) to compare the skin recruitment with subcutaneous lipodissection of the neck alone versus wide undermining and (2) to examine the effect of superiorly oriented superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) movement on jowl excursion in the tumescent face lift.
Methods:
A cadaveric study was performed on five fresh tissue cadavers. Postauricular skin excursion was measured following subcutaneous lipodissection and then measured again after traditional, wide undermining of the neck skin. Jowl excursion (in reference to the mandibular border) was measured following superiorly oriented SMAS excursion. An electronic force gauge was used to measure force application during measurements.
Results:
Cannula lipodissection resulted in a mean skin excursion of 41.9 mm. There was no significant difference in skin excursion compared to wide undermining (41.9 mm versus 42.1 mm; p = 0.785). Jowl position, in reference to the mandibular border, moved superiorly by a mean distance of 18.3 mm with vertical SMAS excursion.
Conclusions:
Subcutaneous cannula lipodissection results in equivalent skin recruitment in comparison to wide undermining of the neck. A superior vector of pull on the SMAS results in vertical excursion of the jowl in reference to the mandibular border.
