Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025
Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
The Efficacy of Breast Implant Irrigant Solutions: A Comparative Analysis Using an In Vitro Model
Ledibabari M Ngaage1, Adekunle Elegbede1, Kristen Brao1
1From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine; the Department of Plastic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital/University of Maryland School of Medicine; the Department of Microbial Pathogenesis, University of Maryland School of Dentistry; the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine; and the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center.
Background:
Infections are challenging complications of implant-based breast reconstruction and augmentation. They pose a clinical challenge, with significant economic implications. One proposed solution is implant irrigation at the time of placement. There is no consensus on the optimal irrigant solution.
Methods:
The authors tested the relative efficacy of 10% povidone-iodine, Clorpactin, Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution, or normal saline (negative control) against two strains each of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis. Sterile, smooth silicone implant disks were immersed in irrigant solution, then incubated in suspensions of methicillin-resistant S. aureus or S. epidermidis overnight. The disks were rinsed and sonicated to displace adherent bacteria from the implant surface, and the displaced bacteria were quantified. Normalized values were calculated to characterize the relative efficacy of each irrigant.
Results:
Povidone-iodine resulted in reductions of the bacterial load by a factor of 10 to 10 for all strains. Prontosan-treated smooth breast implant disks had a 10-fold reduction in bacterial counts for all but one methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain. In comparison to Prontosan, triple-antibiotic solution demonstrated a trend of greater reduction in methicillin-resistant S. aureus bacterial load and weaker activity against S. epidermidis strains. Clorpactin reduced the recovered colony-forming units for only a single strain of S. epidermidis. Povidone-iodine demonstrated the greatest efficacy against all four strains. However, Clorpactin, triple-antibiotic solution, and Prontosan demonstrated similar efficacies.
Conclusions:
Povidone-iodine was the most efficacious of the irrigants at reducing methicillin-resistant S. aureus and S. epidermidis contamination. Given the recent lifting of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration moratorium, larger clinical studies of povidone-iodine as a breast implant irrigant solution are warranted.
Clinical Question/Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic, V.
