Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Primary Production01:06

Primary Production

24.9K
The total amount of energy acquired by primary producers in an ecosystem is called gross primary production (GPP). However, of this energy, producers use some for metabolic processes, and some is lost as heat, decreasing the amount of energy available to the next trophic level. The remaining usable amount of energy is called the net primary productivity (NPP). In terrestrial ecosystems, NPP is driven by climate, while light penetration and nutrient availability drive NPP in aquatic ecosystems.
24.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Antarctic Seafloor Annotated Imagery Database.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

The environmental impacts of deep-sea mining.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Amino acid compound-specific isotope analysis reveals island mass effect subsidies in reef-associated Hawaiian zooplankton.

PeerJ·2026
Same author

Sternal Hardware Migration Following Rigid Plate Fixation After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft.

Annals of thoracic surgery short reports·2026
Same author

Looking beyond the vent to the environmental seascapes shaping deep-sea hydrothermal ecosystems.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Evidence of dark oxygen production at the abyssal seafloor.

Nature geoscience·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop
07:43

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Published on: July 2, 2018

9.9K

Deep-Sea Misconceptions Cause Underestimation of Seabed-Mining Impacts.

Craig R Smith1, Verena Tunnicliffe2, Ana Colaço3

  • 1Department of Oceanography, University of Hawaii at Manoa, 1000 Pope Road, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA.

Trends in Ecology & Evolution
|August 4, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Misconceptions about deep-seabed mining

More Related Videos

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.6K
Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities
07:59

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities

Published on: January 6, 2023

4.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop
07:43

Methods for Image-based Surveys of Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Their Habitat Exemplified by the Drop Camera Survey for the Atlantic Sea Scallop

Published on: July 2, 2018

9.9K
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.6K
Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities
07:59

Coral Reef Arks: An In Situ Mesocosm and Toolkit for Assembling Reef Communities

Published on: January 6, 2023

4.0K

Area of Science:

  • Marine Biology
  • Environmental Science
  • Oceanography

Background:

  • Deep-seabed mining poses potential environmental risks.
  • Current impact assessments may be flawed due to scientific misconceptions.
  • Understanding deep-sea ecosystems is critical for responsible resource management.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and address scientific misconceptions related to deep-seabed mining's environmental impacts.
  • To highlight knowledge gaps in deep-sea ecosystem dynamics and sensitivity.
  • To inform effective environmental management strategies for deep-seabed mining.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of scientific misconceptions.
  • Analysis of underestimations in mining footprint assessments.
  • Evaluation of deep-sea ecosystem sensitivity and biodiversity data.

Main Results:

  • Scientific misconceptions lead to underestimations of deep-seabed mining's environmental footprint.
  • Poor understanding of deep-sea ecosystem sensitivity, biodiversity, and dynamics exacerbates impact miscalculations.
  • Existing knowledge gaps hinder accurate environmental risk assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Addressing scientific misconceptions is crucial for accurate environmental impact assessment of deep-seabed mining.
  • Enhanced understanding of deep-sea ecosystems is vital for effective regulation and management.
  • Bridging knowledge gaps will support sustainable deep-seabed resource utilization.