Are Women in Rural India Really Consuming a Less Diverse Diet?
Soumya Gupta1, Naveen Sunder2, Prabhu L Pingali1
1Tata- Cornell Institute for Agriculture and Nutrition, 5922Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Background:
It is widely considered that women have less diverse diets than other household members. However, it has been challenging to establish this empirically since women's diet diversity is measured differently from that of other household members.
Objective:
In this article, we compare women's dietary diversity with that of their respective households and thereby generate a measure of "dietary gap."
Methods:
We measure women's "dietary gap" by using the difference of homogenized household and woman dietary scores (using the same scales). This is done using primary data on 3600 households from 4 districts in India. Additionally, we show the robustness of our results to variations in scale and recall periods used to construct the diet diversity scores.
Results:
Mean difference tests indicate that women consistently consume 0.1 to 0.5 fewer food groups relative to other household members, with the results being statistically significant at the 1% level. The food groups driving this dietary gap are nonstaples like Vitamin A-rich fruits and vegetables, meat/fish/poultry, and dairy.
Conclusions:
Results point toward the discrimination faced by women in the variety of the food consumed, the importance of considering comparability in creating indices of diet diversity, and the need to collect more detailed information on diets. To our knowledge, this is one of the first studies to examine dietary discrimination faced by women using common scales.
More Related Videos
04:46'Boden Food Plate': Novel Interactive Web-based Method for the Assessment of Dietary Intake
Published on: September 18, 2018
09:33Visualizing Field Data Collection Procedures of Exposure and Biomarker Assessments for the Household Air Pollution Intervention Network Trial in India
Published on: December 23, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Diversity of Protists IV
Diversity of Protists I
Diversity of Protists II
Diversity of Protists III
Diversity of Archaea IV
Diversity of Archaea I
