Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Screening for bacteriuria: Microstix and dipslides.

J M Hamilton-Miller, W Brumfitt, S J Brooks

    Postgraduate Medical Journal
    |May 1, 1977
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    A neuroinflammatory compulsivity model of anorexia nervosa (NICAN).

    Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2024
    Same author

    An integrated biological effects assessment of the discharge water into the Sunndalsfjord from an aluminium smelter.

    The Science of the total environment·2023
    Same author

    An integrative biological effects assessment of a mine discharge into a Norwegian fjord using field transplanted mussels.

    The Science of the total environment·2019
    Same author

    Bioaccumulation of selected veterinary medicinal products (VMPs) in the blue mussel (Mytilus edulis).

    The Science of the total environment·2018
    Same author

    Psychological intervention with working memory training increases basal ganglia volume: A VBM study of inpatient treatment for methamphetamine use.

    NeuroImage. Clinical·2016
    Same author

    A macroalgal germling bioassay to assess biocide concentrations in marine waters.

    Marine pollution bulletin·2015
    Same journal

    Dapagliflozin-induced anaphylactic shock.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Comparative efficacy of Janus kinase inhibitors in severe alopecia areata: a network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Two cases of toxic epidermal necrolysis with severe ocular involvement treated with adjunctive tofacitinib.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Diastolic dysfunction and diabetes: the DIADAD study-a retrospective cohort study from Liverpool.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Care, cash, and proof: forensic accountability for war-related starvation.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    Same journal

    Response to traumatic injuries in polo players in England.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2026
    See all related articles

    The Microstix system offers a compact and long-lasting screening method for bacteriuria detection. However, dipslides demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting bacteria in urine specimens compared to Microstix.

    Area of Science:

    • Clinical microbiology
    • Diagnostic technology

    Background:

    • Bacteriuria screening is crucial for diagnosing urinary tract infections.
    • Dipslides are a common method for urine culture, but alternative screening tools are being explored.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the Microstix system as a potential screening technique for bacteriuria.
    • To compare the diagnostic performance of Microstix with traditional dipslides.

    Main Methods:

    • A comparative study involving 228 urine specimens.
    • Parallel testing of Microstix and dipslides against quantitative bacterial counts.
    • Assessment of sensitivity and specificity for both methods.

    Main Results:

    • Dipslides exhibited higher sensitivity (86.7%) compared to Microstix.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Microstix achieved optimal specificity (100%) when both its components agreed (77.6% of results).
  • Microstix offers advantages in shelf-life and compactness.

    • Conclusions:

    • Microstix can be a viable screening tool for bacteriuria, particularly when its components are in agreement.
    • Dipslides remain a more sensitive option for bacteriuria detection.
    • The choice between Microstix and dipslides may depend on specific clinical needs regarding sensitivity, specificity, and logistical factors.