Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Simulating Impacts of Ice Storms on Forest Ecosystems
Published on: June 30, 2020
A Modeling Study of the Causes and Predictability of the Spring 2011 Extreme US Weather Activity
Siegfried Schubert1, Yehui Chang1, Hailan Wang1
1Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA GSFC, Greenbelt, Maryland.
Extreme spring 2011 U.S. weather, particularly Ohio Valley rainfall, was mainly due to an unforced North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) mode. Predictability was limited by this internal variability, despite sea surface temperature and land conditions influencing broader patterns.
Area of Science:
- Atmospheric Science
- Climate Dynamics
- Meteorology
Background:
- Extreme weather events in the U.S. pose significant risks.
- Understanding the drivers of precipitation anomalies is crucial for predictability.
- The interplay of various factors influences large-scale weather patterns.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the causes and predictability of the spring 2011 U.S. extreme weather.
- To assess the impact of sea surface temperature (SST) anomalies, land conditions, and atmospheric modes on precipitation.
- To determine the influence of initial atmospheric conditions on April precipitation forecasts.
Main Methods:
- Utilized Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) reanalyses.
- Employed Goddard Earth Observing System, version 5 (GEOS-5) Atmospheric General Circulation Model simulations.
- Conducted stationary wave model experiments to isolate forcing impacts.
Main Results:
- April 2011 record precipitation in the Ohio River Valley was primarily driven by an unforced, high-amplitude North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO)-like mode.
- Sea surface temperature (SST) forcing (La Niña) influenced continental precipitation patterns, causing drying in the southern plains and wet anomalies in the northeast.
- Realistic North American land conditions enhanced precipitation in the upper Midwest and caused deficits in the southeast.
- March initial atmospheric conditions significantly influenced April precipitation over the eastern U.S., suggesting links to SST forcing and polar vortex behavior.
- SST-forced base states modestly enhanced the amplitude of the NAO response.
Conclusions:
- Unforced internal atmospheric variability, like the NAO, can be a dominant factor in extreme regional precipitation events.
- Predictability of regional precipitation is limited when internal variability is the primary driver.
- Sea surface temperature and land conditions play roles in modulating continental-scale precipitation patterns and influencing internal modes.
- Coupling between SST, land, and atmospheric initial conditions, including stratospheric influences, impacts extended-range predictability.
More Related Videos
10:46A Method of Trigonometric Modelling of Seasonal Variation Demonstrated with Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Data
Published on: December 9, 2015
13:27Exploring the Effects of Atmospheric Forcings on Evaporation: Experimental Integration of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer and Shallow Subsurface
Published on: June 8, 2015
Related Concept Videos
What is Weather?
Global Climate Change
Precipitation Processes
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
What is Climate?
Steps in Outbreak Investigation