Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Oligometastatic RCC: Challenges and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Prognostic Value of Restaging [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG PET/CT in Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Undergoing [<sup>177</sup>Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 Therapy.

Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine·2026
Same author

Rethinking success in modern urology.

BJU international·2026
Same author

Effect of [<sup>68</sup>Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with equivocal or clinically high-risk non-suspicious findings on multiparametric MRI (PRIMARY2): a multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3, randomised controlled trial.

The Lancet. Oncology·2026
Same author

Avoiding Prostate Biopsy in Early Prostate Cancer Detection: From Liquid Biopsy to PSMA-PET.

European urology focus·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant Treatment for Penile Cancer: A Systematic Review of Contemporary Evidence.

Cancers·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

987

PSA-based machine learning model improves prostate cancer risk stratification in a screening population.

Marlon Perera1,2,3, Rohan Mirchandani4, Nathan Papa5,6

  • 1Department of Urology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. marlonlperera@gmail.com.

World Journal of Urology
|August 5, 2020
PubMed
Summary

A new machine learning model improves prostate cancer diagnosis by analyzing Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) levels, free-PSA, age, and the free-PSA to total PSA (FTR) ratio. This approach enhances risk stratification accuracy compared to traditional methods.

Keywords:
Artificial intelligenceMachine learningProstate cancerProstate cancer screeningProstate-specific membrane antigen

More Related Videos

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer&#8212;Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

495
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

631

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence
08:05

Detection and Isolation of Cancer in Prostate Biopsies Using Stimulated Raman Histology and Artificial Intelligence

Published on: June 10, 2025

987
A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer&#8212;Super Active Surveillance
05:19

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance

Published on: November 7, 2025

495
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
05:33

Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System

Published on: July 11, 2025

631

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Oncology
  • Machine Learning in Medicine

Background:

  • Prostate cancer diagnosis heavily relies on Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) testing, but its accuracy is limited.
  • Improving prostate cancer risk stratification requires incorporating patient demographics and additional biochemical markers.
  • There is a need for accurate, cost-effective models using objective measures for better prostate cancer risk assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a contemporary, accurate, and cost-effective model for prostate cancer risk stratification.
  • To enhance the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer screening beyond traditional PSA testing.
  • To leverage machine learning for improved prediction of prostate cancer.

Main Methods:

  • A machine learning model was developed using data from a local institution and the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer (PLCO) screening trial.
  • The model was trained on a dataset of 3638 patients, incorporating Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA), free-PSA, age, and the free-PSA to total PSA (FTR) ratio.
  • The model's performance was validated on a separate set of 910 patients.

Main Results:

  • The developed machine learning model demonstrated improved prediction for prostate cancer with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.72.
  • This performance surpasses that of PSA alone (AUC 0.63), age (AUC 0.52), free-PSA (AUC 0.50), and FTR alone (AUC 0.65).
  • At 80% sensitivity, the model achieved 45.3% specificity, indicating a significant improvement in diagnostic accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • A dense neural network model significantly improved diagnostic accuracy in screening for prostate cancer.
  • Machine learning methods offer additional utility in prostate cancer risk stratification when combined with biochemical parameters.
  • The findings support the integration of advanced computational models for more precise prostate cancer detection.