Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Ultrasound Based Assessment of Coronary Artery Flow and Coronary Flow Reserve Using the Pressure Overload Model in Mice
Published on: April 13, 2015
Relationship between coronary microvascular dysfunction and left ventricular diastolic function in patients with
Jeng Hwan Lam1,2, Jing Xian Quah3, Thomas Davies4,5
1Department of Medicine, Sunshine Coast Hospital and Health Services, Birtinya, Qld, Australia.
Insights
This study found no link between diastolic dysfunction and coronary microvascular function in patients with chest pain. Further research is needed to understand heart failure with preserved ejection fraction mechanisms.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Cardiovascular Physiology
Background:
- Diastolic dysfunction (DD) affects up to 35% of adults, potentially leading to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a suspected contributor to HFpEF pathogenesis.
- The relationship between CMD and diastolic function in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries (CPUCA) requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the association between coronary microvascular function and resting echocardiographic indices of left ventricular diastolic function.
- To explore potential links between CMD and DD in patients presenting with chest pain but without obstructive coronary artery disease.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study of 149 patients with chest pain assessed via CT coronary angiogram.
- Coronary microvascular dysfunction assessed using myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR < 2.0) via myocardial contrast echocardiography.
- Echocardiographic diastolic function indices (septal mitral annular e', E/e', E/A ratio) measured from baseline transthoracic echocardiograms.
Main Results:
- Mean MBFR was 2.2, with 37% of patients exhibiting CMD (MBFR < 2.0).
- Age, not MBFR, was a significant predictor of increased septal mitral annular E/e' in univariate analysis.
- Multivariable analysis revealed no association between septal mitral annular E/e' and MBFR after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors.
Conclusions:
- No significant relationship was identified between echocardiographic measures of left ventricular diastolic function and coronary microvascular function at rest.
- These findings suggest that CMD may not be directly associated with diastolic dysfunction in this specific patient cohort.
Backgroud:
Diastolic dysfunction (DD) is reported to affect up to 35% of the adult general population. The consequence of progressive DD is heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has been suggested as one of the pathologic mechanisms leading to HFpEF. We investigated whether there was an association between coronary microvascular function and echocardiographic indices of left ventricular diastolic function at rest in patients with chest pain and unobstructed coronary arteries (CPUCA).
Methods:
This retrospective observational study recruited patients referred to cardiology clinics assessment of chest pain who subsequently underwent assessment via CT coronary angiogram (CTA). Coronary microvascular dysfunction was determined by myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR; <2.0) using myocardial contrast echocardiography. Echocardiographic indices of diastolic function (septal mitral annular e'; septal mitral annular E/e', E/A ratio) were measured from baseline transthoracic echocardiogram.
Results:
149 patients (52% men) with a mean age 59.7(9.5) years were recruited. Mean (standard deviation) MBFR was 2.2 (0.51). 37% (55/149) had MBFR < 2.0. Median [interquartile range] septal mitral annular e' velocity and septal mitral annular E/e' were 7.6 cm/s [6.2, 8.9] and 9.5 [7.5, 10.8], respectively. Univariate regression analysis showed only age was a significant predictor of increasing septal mitral annular E/e' (β = +0.20 95% CI 0.13, +0.28, P < .001) but not MBFR. Multivariable analysis also showed no association between these septal mitral annular E/e' and MBFR after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors.
Conclusion:
There was no relationship found between echocardiographic indices of left ventricular diastolic function and coronary microvascular function at rest.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease II: Pathophysiology
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
Angina I: Introduction
Coronary Artery Disease III: Clinical Manifestations
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction

