Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Solving room impulse response inverse problems using flow matching with analytic Wiener denoisera).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Active acoustic enhancement systems: A review.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

On the role of speech similarity in the detection of room acoustic differences.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Multi-stage representation learning for blind Room-Acoustic parameter estimation with uncertainty quantification.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Cropping room impulse responses using unimodal regression of their covariance.

JASA express letters·2025
Same author

Non-stationary noise removal from repeated sweep measurements.

JASA express letters·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

27.8K

No dynamic visual capture for self-translation minimum audible angle.

Olli S Rummukainen1, Sebastian J Schlecht2, Emanuël A P Habets1

  • 1International Audio Laboratories Erlangen, A Joint Institution of the Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg and Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits, Erlangen, Germany.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Visual cues do not significantly alter auditory localization during self-translation. The minimum audible angle for sound localization (ST-MAA) remained unaffected by visual stimuli in this study.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

987
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension
06:49

Using Eye Movements to Evaluate the Cognitive Processes Involved in Text Comprehension

Published on: January 10, 2014

27.8K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

987
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

4.8K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Human psychophysics
  • Multisensory integration

Background:

  • Auditory localization, the ability to determine the location of a sound source, is crucial for spatial awareness.
  • Visual cues are known to influence auditory perception, a phenomenon known as multisensory integration.
  • Dynamic self-translation by a listener can provide self-motion cues that aid auditory localization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of dynamic visual cues on auditory localization during listener self-translation.
  • To determine if congruent or incongruent visual motion affects the minimum audible angle (MAA) for self-translation (ST-MAA).

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a sound localization task involving lateral self-translation in the horizontal plane.
  • Dynamic visual cues, matching or mismatching the self-motion, were presented alongside auditory stimuli.
  • The audio-only self-translation minimum audible angle (ST-MAA) was measured as a baseline.

Main Results:

  • The previously established audio-only ST-MAA was confirmed.
  • The addition of dynamic visual cues, whether matching or mismatching the self-motion, did not significantly change the ST-MAA.
  • No significant difference was found in ST-MAA performance with or without visual stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • Dynamic visual cues do not appear to modulate auditory localization performance during self-motion in the tested paradigm.
  • The robustness of self-motion cues in auditory localization may limit the influence of visual information under these specific experimental conditions.
  • Further research could explore different types of visual stimuli or motion paradigms to understand multisensory interactions in auditory localization.