Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

867
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
867
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

4.0K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
4.0K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

2.3K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
2.3K
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System01:30

Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System

1.2K
Health Information Technology (HIT)
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
1.2K
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

1.1K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
1.1K
Introduction to Statistical Process Control01:15

Introduction to Statistical Process Control

510
Statistical Process Control (SPC) is a method used to monitor and control quality within processes, particularly in manufacturing and service delivery, by employing statistical methods. SPC aims to distinguish between natural (common cause) variation and variation due to specific changes or events (special cause), allowing for timely improvements and sustained quality. The control chart, a pivotal tool in SPC, visually displays data over time alongside a central line of upper and lower control...
510

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The ASSIST CLAD study: A phase 2 randomized controlled trial of mesenchymal stromal cells for new-onset chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Health impacts of poor water quality on an endangered shorebird breeding programme in Aotearoa New Zealand.

New Zealand veterinary journal·2023
Same author

Speed of clinical improvement in the real-world setting from patient-reported Psoriasis Symptoms and Signs Diary: Secondary outcomes from the Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes through 12 weeks.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2023
Same author

Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

The perceived costs and benefits of mentoring college students with intellectual disability on stereotype consistent and inconsistent tasks.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.5K

"Always Events® "… just another quality improvement tool … or is it?

L Harding, P Park, M Thorniley

    Radiography (London, England : 1995)
    |August 6, 2020
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Always Events® improve patient care by involving patients in identifying needs. Implementing this quality improvement methodology in radiology ensures patients are informed about wait times, enhancing their experience.

    Keywords:
    Always Events®CoproductionPatient experienceQuality improvementResearch into practiceWhat matters to you?

    More Related Videos

    Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
    05:56

    Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    360
    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    876

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
    06:05

    The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

    Published on: February 19, 2021

    1.5K
    Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis
    05:56

    Implementation of Non-invasive Point of Care Transient Elastography for Evaluation of Liver Disease in Pediatric Populations with Cystic Fibrosis

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    360
    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning
    10:39

    Qualitative and Quantitative Validation of Tools with Rating Scales Aimed at Assessing the Quality of University Service-Learning

    Published on: August 29, 2025

    876

    Area of Science:

    • Healthcare Quality Improvement
    • Patient-Centered Care
    • Radiology Services

    Background:

    • Always Events® are crucial aspects of healthcare experiences that should consistently occur.
    • This methodology prioritizes patient input, starting with "what matters to you?" to drive improvements through coproduction.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To highlight the value of implementing an Always Event® in a hospital Radiology department.
    • To demonstrate a rapid approach combining research, evaluation, and implementation of findings.

    Main Methods:

    • An Always Event® was conducted within the Radiology department at Warrington and Halton Hospitals.
    • Patient, staff, and volunteer experiences were gathered to evaluate outcomes and impact.

    Main Results:

    • Patients expressed a need to be informed about examination waiting times.
    • Over 90% of patients are now informed of their waiting time, a process embedded in daily activities.

    Conclusions:

    • Listening to patients and involving them in quality improvement significantly benefits the care experience.
    • This approach fosters a positive research culture, advancing the profession and improving radiology services.