Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
Published on: October 20, 2022
The Dark Side of Relational Leadership: Positive and Negative Reciprocity as Fundamental Drivers of Follower's
Tim Vriend1, Ramzi Said1, Onne Janssen1
1Department of Human Resource Management and Organizational Behavior, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
Abstract:
In this study, we use a social exchange perspective to examine when [i.e., high- vs. low-quality leader-member exchange (LMX)], why (i.e., positive vs. negative reciprocity), and how (i.e., pro-leader vs. pro-self unethical behavior) followers consider unethical behavior that either benefits the leader or the self. Across an experimental and a time-split survey study, we find that high-quality LMX relationships motivate pro-leader unethical intention as a means to satisfy positive reciprocity motives, and that low-quality LMX relationships motivate pro-self unethical intention as a means to satisfy negative reciprocity motives. Importantly, our studies demonstrate that it is crucial to incorporate both positive and negative reciprocity motives when studying the effects of LMX. Implications of these results for social exchange theory, LMX, and the broader literature of (self- and other-serving) unethical behavior are discussed.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
11:51Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
Related Concept Videos
Factors Influencing Attraction IV: Reciprocity
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Serving Bias
Strategies of Self-Presentation I: Strategic Self-Presentation
Social Proof
Equity Theory