Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Surgical Robot-Assisted Transanal Specimen Extraction Radical Sigmoidectomy Without an Auxiliary Abdominal Incision
Published on: June 13, 2025
Enhanced recovery protocol improves postoperative outcomes and minimizes narcotic use following resection for colon
Alexander R Cortez1, Al-Faraaz Kassam1, Nick C Levinsky1
1Cincinnati Research in Outcomes and Safety in Surgery (CROSS), Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Background:
Enhanced recovery protocols are associated with improved recovery. However, data on outcomes following the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol in colorectal cancer are limited. We set out to study the postoperative outcomes, opioid use patterns, and cost impact for patients undergoing colon or rectal resection for cancer.
Methods:
A retrospective review of all elective colorectal cancer resections from January 2015 to June 2018 at a single institution was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes were collected. Colon and rectal patients were studied separately, with comparison of patients before and after the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol.
Results:
One hundred ninety-two patients underwent elective colorectal resection for cancer. In January 2016, an enhanced recovery protocol was implemented for all elective resections - 71 patients (33 colon and 38 rectal) underwent surgery before implementation and 121 patients (56 colon and 65 rectal) underwent surgery after implementation of the enhanced recovery protocol. There were no differences with regard to age, gender, or body mass index before or after implementation (all P > .05). For both colon and rectal cancer patients, the enhanced recovery protocol reduced time to regular diet (both P < .05) and length of stay (colon: 3 vs 4 days; rectal: 4 vs 6 days; both P < .01). Enhanced recovery protocol patients also consumed fewer total narcotics (colon: 44 vs 184 morphine milligram equivalents, P < .01; rectal: 121 vs 393 morphine milligram equivalents, P < .01).
Conclusions:
Enhanced recovery protocol use reduced length of stay and narcotic use with similar total costs and no difference in 30-day complications for both colon and rectal cancer resections.
More Related Videos
08:26Clinical Application of Single-Surgeon, Three-Port, Laparoscopic Resection for Colorectal Cancer with Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction
Published on: March 24, 2023
03:53Author Spotlight: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface (RPNI) Surgery in Postamputation Pain Management
Published on: March 15, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD: