Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model01:13

Parameters Affecting Nonlinear Elimination: Zero-Order Input, First-Order Absorption and Two-Compartment Model

208
Drugs administered through various routes can lead to nonlinear elimination, resulting in complex pharmacokinetic behaviors crucial to understanding efficacious drug dosing.
When a drug is administered through a constant intravenous infusion and eliminated via nonlinear pharmacokinetics, it follows zero-order input. For example, oral drugs undergo first-order absorption upon administration and are eliminated through nonlinear pharmacokinetics.
In the case of subcutaneously administered drugs,...
208
Serial Position Effect01:03

Serial Position Effect

399
The serial position effect is a cognitive phenomenon where individuals are more likely to recall the first and last items in a list compared to those in the middle. This effect is divided into the primacy effect and the recency effect. The primacy effect is observed when the initial items in a list are remembered better. This occurs because these items are rehearsed more frequently or receive more elaborative processing, allowing them to be encoded into long-term memory more effectively. For...
399
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.7K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.7K
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.3K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.3K
Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests01:19

Expected Frequencies in Goodness-of-Fit Tests

6.1K
A goodness-of-fit test is conducted to determine whether the observed frequency values are statistically similar to the frequencies expected for the dataset. Suppose the expected frequencies for a dataset are equal such as when predicting the frequency of any number appearing when casting a die. In that case, the expected frequency is the ratio of the total number of observations (n)  to the number of categories (k).
6.1K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

7.9K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
7.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Distal Radius Malunion Correction Without Bone Graft: A Systematic Review.

Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances·2026
Same author

The effects of instructions on performance in lineups and showups.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2026
Same author

Evaluating image modification as a harm reduction approach in content moderation.

Psychological research·2026
Same author

Biomarkers to predict, prevent, and treat persistent pain: omics.

Pain·2025
Same author

Qualitative evaluations of women's leadership programs: a global, multi-sector systematic review.

Australian journal of psychology·2025
Same author

Generative artificial intelligence: the 'more knowledgeable other' in a social constructivist framework of medical education.

NPJ digital medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

720

Do sequential lineups impair underlying discriminability?

Matthew Kaesler1, John C Dunn2,3, Keith Ransom4

  • 1University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5005, Australia. matt.kaesler@gmail.com.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications
|August 6, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Appropriate measurement models reveal that sequential lineups do not improve underlying discriminability in eyewitness memory tests compared to simultaneous lineups, despite more conservative responses.

Keywords:
Eyewitness identificationLineupsSequential lineupSignal detection modelSimultaneous lineup

More Related Videos

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.6K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 13, 2025

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

720
An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice
08:35

An Operant Intra-/Extra-dimensional Set-shift Task for Mice

Published on: January 22, 2016

12.6K
Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm
09:49

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Forensic Science
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Eyewitness memory testing methods have been debated for over 30 years.
  • Resolution requires appropriate measurement models for evaluating lineup procedures.
  • Diagnostic feature detection theory predicts higher discriminability for simultaneous over sequential lineups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and apply measurement models for simultaneous and sequential lineup procedures.
  • To compare these lineup types based on discriminability and response bias.
  • To test a key prediction of diagnostic feature detection theory.

Main Methods:

  • Developed measurement models for simultaneous and sequential lineup presentations.
  • Applied models to existing data (Palmer & Brewer, 2012) and new experimental data.
  • Analyzed eight recent studies comparing simultaneous and sequential lineups.

Main Results:

  • Sequential lineups resulted in more conservative responses.
  • Little to no difference in underlying discriminability was found between simultaneous and sequential lineups.
  • Findings challenge a key prediction of diagnostic feature detection theory.

Conclusions:

  • The study's findings have implications for diagnostic feature detection theory.
  • Results inform the understanding of sequential lineup effectiveness in eyewitness identification.
  • Further research is needed on various sequential lineup types used in legal systems.