Does spirometric tests meet the acceptability criteria? Data from a tertiary chest hospital in Turkey

First step is to evaluate the quality of the test in interpreting spirometries. International societies have defined the acceptability criteria for spirometric tests. With this study, it was aimed to evaluate spirometric tests in terms of compliance with international acceptability criteria and to determine error types.

Spirometric manoeuvres held at a tertiary chest diseases hospital were evaluated as to whether the acceptability criteria of "American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS/ERS)" guideline were maintained or not. Errors determined were classified as unexplosive start of expiration, submaximal effort, cough, closure of glottis, missing closure of the loop ring and early termination of expiration.

Among tests evaluated (n= 510), 276 (54.1%) belonged to female and 234 (45.9%) to male subjects. Average age of subjects was 56.1 ± 15.0 years. It was noted that 318 (62.4%) of the tests met acceptability criteria, whereas 192 (37.6%) did not. The most frequently noted error type is submaximal effort by 30.2% followed by missing closure of the loop, early terminaton of expiration, coughing, unexplosive start of expiration and closure of glottis. In the tests whose spirometric maneuvers did not meet the criteria, the mean age of the patients was significantly higher than in the appropriate tests. When the cases were grouped according to their age, it was observed that the rate of conformity of spirometric examinations decreased significantly as the age range increased.

Within this study it is the first time in our country that evaluation of spirometric studies has been made to see the rate of conformity with international standarts. Although it is thought that spirometric examinations are not technically appropriate in clinical practice throughout our country, there is no data in the literature. Although the center where the study is conducted is a tertiary chest diseases hospital, the data obtained reveal that in spirometric evaluations, a substantially non-standard examination was performed.