Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Associations Between Four Common Cancers and Disability
Lisa I Iezzoni1,2, Sowmya R Rao3,4, Nicole D Agaronnik1
1Health Policy Research Center-Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital.
Background:
Approximately 61 million Americans have a disability. Little research has explored whether disability is associated with subsequent diagnosis of cancer, the second-leading cause of death in the United States. The objective of this study was to explore associations between cancer and disability, focusing on 4 cancers that may present with nonspecific symptoms that could be conflated with aspects of disability, thus delaying cancer diagnoses. An analysis of a nationally representative survey using sampling weights to produce national estimates was performed.
Methods:
Civilian, noninstitutionalized US residents responding to the 2010-2017 National Health Interview Surveys totaling 259,392 Sample Adult Core survey respondents were included. We used self-reported functional status limitations to identify persons with movement difficulties (MD), complex activity limitations (CAL), and no disability. Multivariable regressions predicting cancer diagnosis included sociodemographic characteristics, tobacco use, body mass index, access to care indicators, and disability status.
Results:
Persons with preexisting disability had significantly higher rates of cancer (ranging from 0.40 [SE, 0.05] for ovarian to 3.38 [0.14] for prostate) than did those without disability (0.20 [0.02] and 1.26 [0.04] for the same cancers; all P<.0001). Multivariable analyses found strong associations of preexisting MD and CAL with colorectal cancer, with adjusted odds ratios (aORs) of 1.5 (95% CI, 1.2-1.9) and 1.9 (1.5-2.4), respectively. For non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, the aOR for CAL was 1.5 (1.1-2.1). For prostate cancer, aORs for MD were 1.2 (1.0-1.3) and 1.1 (1.0-1.3) for CAL. Using cross-sectional survey data, we could only identify statistical associations, not causality.
Conclusions:
Our population-based analyses suggest that persons with disability may constitute a high-risk population, with higher cancer incidence. Optimizing appropriate screening and fully investigating new signs and symptoms are therefore critical for patients with disability.
More Related Videos
07:13Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Longitudinal Research