How many patients with heart failure are eligible for cardiac contractility modulation therapy?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Evaluation of Cardiac Contractility Modulation Therapy in 2D Human Stem Cell-Derived Cardiomyocytes
Published on: December 16, 2022
Rajdip Dulai1, Ahmed Chilmeran1, Mazin Hassan1
1Cardiology Research Department, East Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Eastbourne District General Hospital, Eastbourne, UK.
Insights
Only 5.1% of heart failure patients meet criteria for cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy. This small group, however, lacks alternative device options for their condition.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Heart Failure Management
Background:
- Cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy shows promise for improving heart failure symptoms.
- Patient selection is crucial for successful CCM therapy outcomes.
- Current criteria aim to identify heart failure patients most likely to benefit.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the proportion of unselected heart failure patients eligible for CCM therapy.
- To analyze the characteristics of patients meeting CCM criteria.
- To assess the potential impact of CCM therapy on a broader heart failure population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective audit of 475 heart failure admissions in UK district general hospitals (2018).
- Evaluation of patients against established CCM selection criteria: ejection fraction (25-45%), QRS duration (<130 ms), NYHA class (3-4), and stable medication for ≥90 days.
- Exclusion criteria included significant valvular disease, atrial fibrillation, and palliative care intent.
Main Results:
- Only 5.1% (24/475) of audited patients met the criteria for CCM therapy.
- Eligible patients had a mean ejection fraction of 32.5% ± 7.4% and were predominantly male (71%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy (75%).
- Inclusion of patients with atrial fibrillation could increase eligibility by an additional 3.8%.
Conclusions:
- Cardiac contractility modulation therapy is currently suitable for a small fraction (5.1%) of the general heart failure population.
- Despite low numbers, these patients represent a group with limited alternative device-based treatment options.
- Further research may explore expanding CCM eligibility criteria or alternative therapies for heart failure patients.
Background:
Increasing evidence exists suggesting that cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCM) improves symptoms in heart failure patients if various selection criteria are fulfilled. The aim of this study is to analyse an unselected sample of heart failure patients to establish what percentage of patients would meet the current criteria for CCM therapy.
Methods:
All patients admitted to two district general hospitals in the UK in 2018 with a diagnosis of heart failure were audited for eligibility for CCM therapy. The selection criteria were (a) ejection fraction (EF) 25%-45%, (b) QRS duration less than 130 ms, (c) New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 3-4 and (d) treated for heart failure for at least 90 days and on stable medications. Exclusion criteria included: (a) significant valvular disease, (b) permanent or persistent atrial fibrillation, (c) biventricular pacing system implanted or QRS duration more than 130 ms and (4) patients not suitable for device therapy as a result of palliative treatment intent.
Results:
A total of 475 patients were admitted with heart failure during the study period. From this group, 24 (5.1%) patients fulfilled the criteria for CCM therapy. The mean age and ejection fraction were 70.8 ± 10.2 and 32.5% ± 7.4%. The majority of patients were men (71%) and had an ischaemic cardiomyopathy (75%). If patients with atrial fibrillation were included, an additional 18 (3.8%) patients potentially may be eligible for CCM.
Conclusion:
Only 5.1% of all patients presenting with heart failure might benefit from cardiac CCM. This is a small proportion of the overall heart failure population. However, this population has no other current option for device therapy of their condition.
More Related Videos
09:20Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System