Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Gene Conversion

Gene Conversion

Other than maintaining genome stability via DNA repair, homologous recombination plays an important role in diversifying the genome. In fact, the recombination of sequences forms the molecular basis of genomic evolution. Random and non-random permutations of genomic sequences create a library of new amalgamated sequences. These newly formed genomes can determine the fitness and survival of cells. In bacteria, homologous and non-homologous types of recombination lead to the evolution of new...

Gene Conversion

Gene Conversion

Genome Copying Errors

Genome Copying Errors

DNA replication is a well-evolved process that copies millions of base pairs with high fidelity during each cell division. Occasionally a wrong base or a long stretch of wrong bases may get added to the daughter strands. If the errors are left unchecked, cells might accumulate several mutations that might endanger their survival. Therefore, the copying errors are checked and repaired at three levels.

Recombinant DNA

Recombinant DNA

Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation

Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation

Because the DNA segments are cut and reorganized in a direction-specific manner, site-specific recombination has emerged as an efficient genetic engineering technique. Flippase and Cyclization recombinases or Flp and Cre, respectively, are two members of the tyrosine recombinase family derived from bacteriophages, that are used to mediate site-specific DNA insertions, deletions, and targeted expression of proteins in mammalian cell lines.
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...

Exon Recombination

Exon Recombination

The evolution of new genes is critical for speciation. Exon recombination, also known as exon shuffling or domain shuffling, is an important means of new gene formation. It is observed across vertebrates, invertebrates, and in some plants such as potatoes and sunflowers. During exon recombination, exons from the same or different genes recombine and produce new exon-intron combinations, which might evolve into new genes.
Exon shuffling follows “splice frame rules.” Each exon...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Whose Genome? Which Genetics?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2023

Same author

Global health and global governance of emerging biomedical technologies.

Journal of medical ethics·2023

Same author

Trojan Horses, Clinical Utility, and Parfitian Puzzles.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2022

Same author

Days of Future Past: Reply to Open Peer Commentaries on "Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes".

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2020

Same author

Intergenerational monitoring in clinical trials of germline gene editing.

Journal of medical ethics·2019

Same journal

Defending the Ethical Permissibility of Laryngeal Transplantation.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

A Framework of Institutional Obligations for Pragmatic Clinical Trials.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

Should Adherence to Medical Recommendations Be a Requirement for Kidney Transplant Candidacy?

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

How "America First" Abandoned Global Health: The Case for an African Model.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

Carrots and Sticks: Incentives in Shaping Digital Health Products.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

Same journal

From Empowerment to Offloading: Task Shifting and the Redistribution of Responsibility in Digital Health.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Subcloning Plus Insertion SPI - A Novel Recombineering Method for the Rapid Construction of Gene Targeting Vectors

Subcloning Plus Insertion SPI - A Novel Recombineering Method for the Rapid Construction of Gene Targeting Vectors

Published on: January 8, 2015

Revising, Correcting, and Transferring Genes.

¹Portland State University.

The American Journal of Bioethics : AJOB

|August 8, 2020

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Distinguishing between revising, correcting, and transferring genes in germline gene editing is crucial for ethical considerations. This nuanced approach impacts research, regulation, and clinical applications of gene editing technologies.

Keywords:

Gene editing germline intervention mitochondrial replacement therapy somatic/germline distinction

More Related Videos

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Published on: May 25, 2018

Recombineering Homologous Recombination Constructs in Drosophila

Recombineering Homologous Recombination Constructs in Drosophila

Published on: July 13, 2013

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Subcloning Plus Insertion SPI - A Novel Recombineering Method for the Rapid Construction of Gene Targeting Vectors

Subcloning Plus Insertion SPI - A Novel Recombineering Method for the Rapid Construction of Gene Targeting Vectors

Published on: January 8, 2015

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Enhanced Genome Editing with Cas9 Ribonucleoprotein in Diverse Cells and Organisms

Published on: May 25, 2018

Recombineering Homologous Recombination Constructs in Drosophila

Recombineering Homologous Recombination Constructs in Drosophila

Published on: July 13, 2013

Area of Science:

Bioethics
Human Gene Editing
Molecular Biology

Background:

The ethics of human gene editing heavily rely on the distinction between germline and somatic gene editing.
Current ethical discussions often treat all germline interventions as a monolithic category, leading to broad calls for moratoria.
Advancements in germline gene editing research reveal significant differences among interventions, necessitating a more refined ethical framework.

Purpose of the Study:

To argue for a more granular ethical analysis of germline gene editing.
To propose a distinction between revising, correcting, and transferring genes within the germline.
To assess the ethical implications of these distinctions for research, regulation, and clinical use.

Main Methods:

Conceptual analysis of germline gene editing interventions.
Ethical assessment based on differentiating gene editing types.
Review of existing ethical guidelines and scientific discourse.

Main Results:

Not all germline gene editing interventions are ethically equivalent.
Distinguishing between revising, correcting, and transferring genes offers a more precise ethical evaluation.
This differentiation has significant consequences for the justification of research, regulation, and clinical applications.

Conclusions:

A nuanced ethical framework for germline gene editing is essential.
Differentiating interventions like revising, correcting, and transferring genes is critical for responsible advancement.
This refined ethical approach can guide future policy and clinical practice in human gene editing.