Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in iPSCs and Genetic Disease Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Melinda L Tursky1, To Ha Loi1, Crisbel M Artuz2
1Blood, Stem Cell, and Cancer Research Programme, St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research and Department of Hematology and BM Transplant, St Vincent's Hospital, Level 8, 405 Liverpool Street, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia; St Vincent's Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2010, Australia.
Abstract:
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are an invaluable resource for the study of human disease. However, there are no standardized methods for differentiation into hematopoietic cells, and there is a lack of robust, direct comparisons of different methodologies. In the current study we improved a feeder-free, serum-free method for generation of hematopoietic cells from iPSCs, and directly compared this with three other commonly used strategies with respect to efficiency, repeatability, hands-on time, and cost. We also investigated their capability and sensitivity to model genetic hematopoietic disorders in cells derived from Down syndrome and β-thalassemia patients. Of these methods, a multistep monolayer-based method incorporating aryl hydrocarbon receptor hyperactivation ("2D-multistep") was the most efficient, generating significantly higher numbers of CD34+ progenitor cells and functional hematopoietic progenitors, while being the most time- and cost-effective and most accurately recapitulating phenotypes of Down syndrome and β-thalassemia.

