Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Evidence Base for the Use of PRRT
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Abstract:
The development of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) in disseminated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has been a long and protracted process. The idea was born within nuclear medicine academia but its translation to clinical practice has been marked by misunderstanding of the rigors of the processes used in drug registration. There were several false starts and some of the required basic science did not occur until after first in man studies. The standard process of preclinical, phase 1, 2 and 3 clinical trials were sometimes blurred and the required data including the assurances that patients were studied on protocol was missing from subsequent publications. Despite this there was a growing conviction and increasing evidence that the use of PRRT had a positive benefit in both survival and symptom relief in about 80% of treated patients. After a decade and a half of false starts and incomplete data a formal randomized controlled trial was conducted comparing PRRT with high dose somatostatin which clearly proved that PRRT was both safe, effective and the treatment of choice in hormone refractory NETs.
Insights
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) offers significant survival and symptom relief benefits for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). A randomized trial confirmed PRRT as a safe, effective treatment choice for hormone-refractory NETs.
Area of Science:
- Nuclear Medicine
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) development for neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) faced challenges in clinical translation and regulatory processes.
- Early studies lacked rigorous data, despite growing evidence of PRRT's efficacy in improving survival and symptom relief for approximately 80% of patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PRRT compared to standard treatment in patients with neuroendocrine tumors.
- To establish PRRT as a definitive treatment option for hormone-refractory NETs.
Main Methods:
- A decade and a half of research culminated in a formal randomized controlled trial.
- The trial compared PRRT directly against high-dose somatostatin therapy.
Main Results:
- PRRT demonstrated a positive benefit in survival and symptom relief in a significant majority of patients.
- The randomized trial conclusively proved PRRT's safety and effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- PRRT is a safe and effective treatment for neuroendocrine tumors.
- PRRT is the treatment of choice for hormone-refractory NETs, offering improved outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Real Time RT-PCR
The real-time quantification of the number of amplified products is...

