Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025
The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
No Differences in Midterm Sports Participation or Functional Scores After Total Hip Arthroplasty by Posterolateral Vs
Michel P Bonnin1, Michel-Henri Fessy2, Floris Van Rooij3
1Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Centre Orthopédique Santy, Ramsay Santé, Lyon, France; Artro Institute, Lyon, France.
Background:
Patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) frequently question surgeons on return to sports. We compared midterm sports participation and functional scores after THA by posterolateral approach (PLA) vs anterolateral approach (ALA).
Methods:
Of 1381 patients who underwent uncemented ceramic-on-ceramic THA for primary osteoarthritis, 503 were excluded because of preoperative or postoperative lower limb surgery, leaving 594 operated by PLA and 284 by ALA. Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Oxford Hip Score (OHS), satisfaction, as well as motivation, participation, and discomfort regarding 22 sports were collected. A 1:1 matching was performed to obtain 2 groups of PLA and ALA patients with similar age, gender, body mass index, and sports motivation.
Results:
Matching yielded 2 equal groups of 259 patients. There were no significant differences in FJS (P = .057), OHS (P = .685), satisfaction (P = .369), or rates of participation in light (P = .999), moderate (P = .632), or strenuous sports (P = .284). Participation in strenuous sports was reported by 50 PLA (19%) and 61 ALA (24%) patients, with differences for downhill skiing (22 vs 39), running (10 vs 19), and cross-country skiing (18 vs 10). More than 50% of motivated patients practiced most of their sports. Severe discomfort was reported similarly in PLA and ALA patients, mainly during running (13 vs 11), team ball games (9 vs 7), and downhill skiing (7 vs 8).
Conclusion:
There were no significant differences between PLA and ALA patients in terms of OHS, FJS, satisfaction, or sports participation rates. There is little or no evidence to promote an approach based on sports participation or functional improvement.
Level Of Evidence:
Level III, comparative study.
