Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Induction of Right Ventricular Failure by Pulmonary Artery Constriction and Evaluation of Right Ventricular Function in Mice
Published on: May 13, 2019
Prognosis of Patients With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Chronic Total Occlusion According to
Kohki Ishida1, Victoria Martin-Yuste1, Susanna Prat1
1Cardiovascular Institute, Interventional Cardiology Section, Institut d'Investigacions Biomédiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain.
Insights
Patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) and reduced ejection fraction (LVEF) fare better with revascularization (CABG or PCI) than medical therapy. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) offers the best long-term outcomes for CTO patients with reduced LVEF.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Cardiac Surgery
Background:
- Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is prevalent in coronary artery disease.
- Limited research exists on outcomes for CTO patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Treatment strategies for CTO with reduced LVEF require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of treatment on prognosis in patients with CTO and reduced LVEF.
- To compare outcomes between medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).
Main Methods:
- A cohort of 256 patients with CTO and LVEF <40% was studied.
- Patients were categorized into three groups: medical therapy (MT), PCI, and CABG.
- Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including cardiac mortality and myocardial infarction (MI), were compared.
Main Results:
- MACE incidence was significantly lower in PCI (20.3%) and CABG (16.7%) groups compared to MT (40%).
- Both all-cause and cardiac mortality were substantially reduced with revascularization (PCI/CABG) versus MT.
- Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) demonstrated the lowest MACE risk in multivariate analysis compared to MT.
Conclusions:
- Medical therapy is associated with worse prognosis in CTO patients with reduced LVEF compared to revascularization.
- Both PCI and CABG improve outcomes, with CABG showing the best long-term results.
- Revascularization strategies are crucial for managing CTO patients with impaired left ventricular function.
Background:
Chronic total occlusion (CTO) is common among patients with coronary artery disease. Very few studies have focused on outcomes of patients with CTO and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), according to treatment applied. The aim of our study was to determine the potential influence of the selected treatment on the prognosis in patients with CTO associated with reduced LVEF.
Methods:
Between June 2010 and October 2013, all consecutive patients with at least one CTO and reduced LVEF (<40%) were enrolled. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiac mortality or myocardial infarction (MI) and its individual components, were compared between three treatment groups: medical therapy (MT), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and coronary bypass graft (CABG).
Results:
In 256 included patients, the follow-up was 1129 ± 556 days. The incidence of MACE was 40% in the MT group, compared with PCI (20.3%) and CABG (16.7%); p < 0.001. All-cause and cardiac mortality were also higher in the MT group (40.7% and 33.3%, respectively) versus the PCI (21.9% and 15.6%) and CABG (11.9% and 9.5%) groups (p < 0.001 for both endpoints); MI rate did not differ among groups. In the adjusted multivariate analysis, CABG had lower MACE risk, compared with MT (HR = 0.39, 0.17-0.91; p = 0.029); successful PCI also trended toward lower risk of MACE, compared with MT.
Conclusions:
Patients with CTO and reduced LVEF treated with MT had a worse prognosis than those treated with revascularization (either CABG or PCI). Patients with an indication for CABG appeared to perform best during long-term follow-up.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management

