Phytochemical profiling of Balarista formulation by GC-MS analysis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Preparation of Gynura bicolor DC samples for High-Resolution Tandem Mass Spectrometry
Published on: February 2, 2024
Chandan Das1, Debajyoti Das1, Goutam Ghosh1
1Department of Pharmacognosy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Siksha 'O' Anusandhan Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.
Abstract:
GC-MS analysis of different fractions of in-house Balarista formulation (IBF) and marketed Balarista formulations (M1, M2, M3 and M4) confirmed the presence of various active metabolites. The database of National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) library was used to identify these compounds. This study revealed the presence of benzoic acid as a predominant compound in n-hexane fraction of M3 (94.69%), M2 (61.99%) and M4 (56.67%); ethyl acetate fraction of M2 (40.68%); methanol fraction of M2 (49.10%) and M3 (24.02%) formulations. Hexan-2-ol (72.49%); 3,3-Bis(4-hydroxy-3-methylphenyl)-1H-indol-2-one (71.40%); 5-(Hydroxymethyl)furan-2-carbaldehyde (64.52%); Propan-2-ol (57.34%); 1,3,3-Trimethyl-2-oxabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (52.35%); (2 R,3S,4S,5R,6R)-2,3,4,5,6,7-Hexahydroxyheptanal (26.47%) are the other major compounds. Identification of benzoic acid in marketed formulations indicates indiscriminate use of sodium benzoate, which was determined as benzoic acid equivalents. Detection of benzoic acid at high concentration may affect the therapeutic efficacy of these formulations.
More Related Videos
14:39Semi-Targeted Ultra-High-Performance Chromatography Coupled to Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Phenolic Metabolites in Plasma of Elderly Adults
Published on: April 22, 2022
07:29HPLC Coupled with Chemical Fingerprinting for Multi-Pattern Recognition for Identifying the Authenticity of Clematidis Armandii Caulis
Published on: November 11, 2022