Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025
05:17
Detection of Targetable Alterations in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer using Next-generation Sequencing
Published on: October 10, 2025
212
How will we find the elephant in the room?
1Philosophy & Ethics, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.w.n.houkes@tue.nl k.vaesen@tue.nl.
The Behavioral and Brain Sciences
|August 11, 2020
Summary
Osirak and Reynaud's technological-reasoning hypothesis faces challenges. Its concepts and methods are unclear, making empirical differentiation difficult due to intertwined technical potential and expertise.
Area of Science:
- Social Sciences
- Technology Studies
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- The technological-reasoning hypothesis by Osirak and Reynaud proposes a framework for understanding technology adoption and development.
- Existing research has not fully addressed the conceptual clarity and empirical testability of this hypothesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To critically evaluate the conceptual and methodological underpinnings of Osirak and Reynaud's technological-reasoning hypothesis.
- To identify ambiguities in the hypothesis related to the interplay of technical potential and expertise.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis of the technological-reasoning hypothesis.
- Methodological critique of empirical differentiation strategies.
Main Results:
- The technological-reasoning hypothesis presents significant conceptual challenges.
- The interrelation between technical potential and expertise creates ambiguity, obscuring the hypothesis's precise scope.
- The hypothesis is compatible with multiple, empirically indistinguishable alternative hypotheses.
Conclusions:
- The technological-reasoning hypothesis requires refinement to enhance its conceptual clarity and empirical testability.
- Further research is needed to develop methods capable of differentiating the hypothesis from related theoretical constructs.
More Related Videos
12:18A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
7.8K
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
8.5K
Related Concept Videos
01:12Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
8.5K
Error is the deviation of the obtained result from the true, expected value or the estimated central value. Errors are expressed in absolute or relative terms.
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
8.5K
01:15Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors
7.7K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
7.7K
01:00Detection of Gross Error: The Q Test
6.7K
When one or more data points appear far from the rest of the data, there is a need to determine whether they are outliers and whether they should be eliminated from the data set to ensure an accurate representation of the measured value. In many cases, outliers arise from gross errors (or human errors) and do not accurately reflect the underlying phenomenon. In some cases, however, these apparent outliers reflect true phenomenological differences. In these cases, we can use statistical methods...
6.7K
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
274
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
274
01:10Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis
1.6K
The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters...
1.6K
01:19Quality Assurance
867
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
867