Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design01:28

Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design

1.5K
Drug design is a dynamic field that involves discovering and developing new medications based on specific biological targets. This process heavily relies on structure-activity relationships (SAR) and quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) to guide the design and optimization of efficient drugs.
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence...
1.5K
Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction01:30

Quantitative Aspects of Drug-Receptor Interaction

1.6K
The receptor occupancy theory connects a drug's response to the number of occupied receptors. With higher drug concentrations, more receptors are occupied, leading to increased responses. The formation of drug-receptor complexes involves association and dissociation rates, which reach equilibrium when the forward and backward reactions are equal. The equilibrium association constant (Ka) and its inverse, the equilibrium dissociation constant (Kd), indicate drug affinity. Higher Ka and lower...
1.6K
Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:29

Cholinergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

2.6K
Cholinergic antagonists bind to cholinergic receptors and limit the effects of acetylcholine and other cholinergic agonists. Based on the specific cholinergic receptor affinity, these antagonists are classified as muscarinic or nicotinic. Anticholinergics interrupt parasympathetic innervations while sympathetic innervations remain uninterrupted. Muscarinic antagonists are also called 'muscarinic antagonists', 'antimuscarinics', or 'parasympatholytics'. Nicotinic...
2.6K
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:16

Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

3.7K
Adrenergic agonists' structure-activity relationship (SAR) determines their selectivity and efficacy. These agonists comprise a phenylethylamine moiety with an aromatic ring and an ethylamine side chain.
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of...
3.7K
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:29

Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

807
Indirect-acting cholinergic agonists are agents that interact with the acetylcholinesterase enzyme in the synaptic cleft, preventing the breakdown of acetylcholine into choline and acetate. Consequently, the concentration of acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft increases. These agonists can be classified into reversible and irreversible inhibitors based on their duration of action.
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
807
Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship01:22

Direct-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship

1.8K
Cholinergic agonists or cholinomimetics mimic the action of acetylcholine to stimulate the parasympathetic nervous system. They are categorized into direct-acting and indirect-acting agents. The direct-acting cholinergic drugs induce the parasympathetic response by directly binding to the muscarinic or nicotine receptors. In comparison, the indirect-acting cholinergic drugs prevent acetylcholine hydrolysis, indirectly contributing to the extended parasympathetic response.
The direct-acting...
1.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of higher dose primaquine for the radical cure of <i>Plasmodium vivax</i> malaria in Indonesia: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific·2026
Same author

Transmission of rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis in Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam: a prospective genomic epidemiology study.

The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific·2026
Same author

A systematic mapping review of therapeutic clinical trials in dengue.

PLoS neglected tropical diseases·2026
Same author

Spatiotemporal dynamics of adoptively transferred stem-like CD8<sup>+</sup> T cells in the tumor microenvironment following vaccination.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Genome instability triggers intercellular DNA transfer between human cells.

Cell·2026
Same author

Murine osteosarcoma recapitulates the driver landscape and genomic complexity of osteosarcoma evolution in humans.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same journal

conMItion: an R package adjusting confounding factors for associations in multi-omics.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaMFG: a Spatial Multi-omics Integration Method based on Feature Grouping.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

CSCN: Inference of Cell-Specific Causal Networks Using Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Sparse CCA-Based Mediation Analysis with High-Dimensional Exposures and Mediators.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Cross-Context Generalization in Drug Perturbation Prediction with a Multimodal Conditional Diffusion Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Primer Design through Submodular Function Estimation.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.9K

A semi-supervised learning framework for quantitative structure-activity regression modelling.

Oliver Watson1, Isidro Cortes-Ciriano2, James A Watson3,4

  • 1Evariste Technologies Ltd, Goring on Thames RG8 9AL, UK.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|August 11, 2020
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces novel Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) modeling methods to improve drug discovery. These techniques enhance prediction accuracy by comparing molecular fingerprints and adjusting for data biases in preclinical research.

More Related Videos

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.4K
Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports
05:18

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports

Published on: October 20, 2021

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors
10:29

Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship, Activity Prediction, and Molecular Dynamics of Non-nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Published on: May 9, 2025

1.9K
In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
05:47

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox

Published on: August 28, 2019

14.4K
Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports
05:18

Quaternary Structure Modeling Through Chemical Cross-Linking Mass Spectrometry: Extending TX-MS Jupyter Reports

Published on: October 20, 2021

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Computational chemistry
  • cheminformatics
  • drug discovery

Background:

  • Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) methods are vital for preclinical small molecule drug discovery.
  • Supervised learning models in QSAR are trained on molecular structure representations and activity data to predict novel compound activities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop methods addressing key challenges in QSAR modeling.
  • To compare information content of molecular fingerprints relative to a specific target.
  • To quantify prediction accuracy degradation based on data distance and adjust for selection bias.

Main Methods:

  • A novel method for comparing information content between molecular fingerprints.
  • A method to quantify prediction accuracy degradation as a function of data distance.
  • A method to adjust for screening-dependent selection bias in training datasets.
  • A semi-supervised learning framework integrating data distance and bias adjustment.

Main Results:

  • The developed methods were illustrated using the Tres Cantos AntiMalarial Set (TCAMS) data.
  • The study demonstrates improved QSAR modeling by addressing fingerprint information content and data biases.
  • The semi-supervised framework provides predictions considering compound similarity and reporting bias.

Conclusions:

  • The presented methods offer significant advancements for QSAR modeling in drug discovery.
  • These techniques can lead to more accurate predictions of novel compound activities.
  • The study provides tools to overcome common limitations in QSAR training datasets.