Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 13, 2026

Purification of Biotinylated Cell Surface Proteins from Rhipicephalus microplus Epithelial Gut Cells
Published on: July 23, 2017
Resistance of ticks on cattle to amitraz in Zimbabwe
Francis Taenda Makuvadze1, Thokozani Hove2, Pious Makaya3
1Department of Paraclinical Veterinary Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe. francomakuvadze@gmail.com.
Abstract:
Resistance of one host and three host ticks on cattle to amitraz was studied using samples from five diptanks in the Domboshawa Communal Land Area of Zimbabwe. A random tick profile and a questionnaire survey on the tick control practices of the area were also carried out. Engorged Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) decoloratus, Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma hebraeum females were randomly collected from cattle presented for dipping at the 5 diptanks and were allowed to oviposit separately at T: 28 °C and RH: 85-95%. Larvae obtained were tested for resistance against various amitraz concentrations (1-0.0078125%) using the Larval Packet Test (LPT) and were compared with susceptible reference strains of R. (B.) decoloratus (Makuti strain, 2017), R. appendiculatus (Lake Chivero strain, 2015) and A. hebraeum (Lake Mutirikwi strain, 2017). The most abundant tick species were R. (B.) decoloratus (27.2%), Hyalomma rufipes (20.0%), H. truncatum (16.0%), R. appendiculatus (12.0%) and R. evertsi evertsi (11.9%). Amblyomma hebraeum (8.6%) and A. variegatum (1.8%) were the least common in the collection; this suggests that they were not well established in Domboshawa. Low amitraz resistance (RL = I) was detected only in R. (B.) decoloratus at 2 of the 5 diptanks. In the future, decentralised tick control due to inadequate and inconsistent supply of acaricides could introduce a number of factors which could contribute towards resistance development.

