Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Protocol and Guidelines for Point-of-Care Lung Ultrasound in Diagnosing Neonatal Pulmonary Diseases Based on International Expert Consensus
Published on: March 6, 2019
Surfactant lavage for neonatal meconium aspiration syndrome-An updated meta-analysis
Rong Hui1, Pan Jing-Jing2, Zou Yun-Su1
1Department of Neonates, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Background:
Surfactant lavage seems to have a good application prospect both in experimental models and patients with meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). Data regarding the effect of surfactant lavage on pulmonary complications of MAS are conflicting. In view of these uncertainties, an updated meta-analysis including the latest literatures is performed.
Methods:
A search was conducted by two investigators involved in this research in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies in English and other languages, in Wanfang, VIP, and Cnki databases for Chinese studies (all last launched on December 18, 2018). Ultimately, we identified 11 original studies, including the surfactant lavage group (n = 189) and the control group (n = 204). Odds ratio and weighted mean difference were calculated using a random effects or fixed effects model, depending on the data type and heterogeneity of the included studies.
Results:
The comparison of effectiveness on MAS: (1) With respect to oxygen index at 48 hours stage and 72 hours stage, data showed significant difference between surfactant lavage/control groups (we/ighted mean difference [WMD] = -3.37, 95% confidence interval [CI], -5.68 ~ -1.06; p = 0.004 and 95% CI, -5.03 ~ -2.37; p < 0.00001). (2) With respect to days on mechanical ventilation, the analysis showed that there was significant difference between surfactant lavage group and control group (WMD = -1.12, 95% CI, -1.40 ~ -0.84; p < 0.00001). (3) Regarding the need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, days of oxygen therapy, and hospital stay, no significant differences were found. The comparison of possible complications of MAS: (1) Regarding pneumothorax, the analysis showed there was significant difference between surfactant lavage and control groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.24 ~ 0.85; p = 0.01). (2) With respect to mortality, persist pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary hemorrhage, the results showed no difference between the two groups.
Conclusion:
With respect to oxygen index and days on mechanical ventilation, surfactant lavage is significantly effective compared with control group, though didn't eventually shorten days of oxygen therapy and hospital stay. In addition, our meta-analysis showed that surfactant lavage does not increase the risk of complications.
Insights
Surfactant lavage improves oxygenation and reduces mechanical ventilation days for meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS). This treatment does not increase complications but does not shorten hospital stays or oxygen therapy duration.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Respiratory Medicine
- Pediatric Critical Care
Background:
- Meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) poses significant risks to newborns.
- Surfactant lavage shows promise in treating MAS, but its efficacy and safety remain debated.
- Existing data on surfactant lavage for MAS complications are conflicting, necessitating updated analysis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a meta-analysis evaluating the effectiveness of surfactant lavage in managing MAS.
- To assess the impact of surfactant lavage on pulmonary complications and clinical outcomes in MAS patients.
- To provide an updated evidence-based summary of surfactant lavage's role in MAS treatment.
Main Methods:
- Comprehensive literature search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Wanfang, VIP, and Cnki databases.
- Inclusion of 11 original studies comparing surfactant lavage (n=189) with control groups (n=204).
- Statistical analysis using random or fixed effects models to calculate odds ratios and weighted mean differences.
Main Results:
- Surfactant lavage significantly improved oxygen index at 48 and 72 hours (WMD = -3.37, p=0.004; WMD = -2.70, p<0.00001).
- Mechanical ventilation duration was significantly reduced with surfactant lavage (WMD = -1.12, p<0.00001).
- No significant differences were observed in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, oxygen therapy duration, hospital stay, mortality, persistent pulmonary hypertension, or pulmonary hemorrhage. Pneumothorax risk was reduced (OR = 0.46, p=0.01).
Conclusions:
- Surfactant lavage is effective in improving oxygenation and reducing mechanical ventilation duration in MAS.
- The treatment does not appear to increase the risk of serious complications like pneumothorax.
- While beneficial for key respiratory markers, surfactant lavage did not significantly shorten overall oxygen therapy or hospital stay.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Upper Respiratory Drugs: Antitussives, Expectorants, and Mucolytics
Antitussives include codeine, dextromethorphan (Robitussin), and benzonatate (Tessalon). Codeine and dextromethorphan exert their effects centrally by suppressing the cough reflex center in the medulla. Benzonatate operates peripherally within the respiratory tract by...
Breathing
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...

