Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Trabecular Meshwork Response to Pressure Elevation in the Living Human Eye
Published on: June 20, 2015
Utricular Sensitivity during Hydrodynamic Displacements of the Macula
Christopher John Pastras1, Sebastian Paolo Stefani2, Ian S Curthoys3
1The Meniere's Laboratory, School of Medical Sciences, The University of Sydney, Medical Foundation Building, 92-94 Parramatta Road, Camperdown, Sydney, New South Wales, 2050, Australia. christopher.pastras@sydney.edu.au.
Abstract:
To explore the effects of cochlear hair cell displacement, researchers have previously monitored functional and mechanical responses during low-frequency (LF) acoustic stimulation of the cochlea. The induced changes are believed to result from modulation of the conductance of mechano-electrical transduction (MET) channels on cochlear hair cells, along with receptor potential modulation. It is less clear how, or if, vestibular hair cell displacement affects vestibular function. Here, we have used LF (<20 Hz) hydrodynamic modulation of the utricular macula position, whilst recording functional and mechanical responses, to investigate the effects of utricular macula displacement. Measured responses included the Utricular Microphonic (UM), the vestibular short-latency evoked potential (VsEP), and laser Doppler vibrometry recordings of macular position. Over 1 cycle of the LF bias, the UM amplitude and waveform were cyclically modulated, with Boltzmann analysis suggesting a cyclic modulation of the vestibular MET gating. The VsEP amplitude was cyclically modulated throughout the LF bias, demonstrating a relative increase (~20-50 %; re baseline) and decrease (~10-20 %; re baseline), which is believed to be related to the MET conductance and vestibular hair cell sensitivity. The relationship between macular displacement and changes in UM and VsEP responses was consistent within and across animals. These results suggest that the sensory structures underlying the VsEP, often thought to be a cranial jerk-sensitive response, are at least partially sensitive to LF (and possibly static) pressures or motion. Furthermore, these results highlight the possibility that some of the vestibular dysfunction related to endolymphatic hydrops may be due to altered vestibular transduction following mechanical (or morphological) changes in the labyrinth.
More Related Videos
07:18Evaluation of Capillary and Other Vessel Contribution to Macular Perfusion Density Measured with Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography
Published on: February 18, 2022
07:45Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
Published on: July 21, 2020