Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Pre-clinical Evaluation of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors for Treatment of Acute Leukemia
Published on: September 18, 2013
Levofloxacin prophylaxis in hospitalized children with leukemia: A cost-utility analysis
Brandon Maser1,2,3, Marie-Claude Pelland-Marcotte1,2,4, Sarah Alexander1
1The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Levofloxacin antibiotic prophylaxis is cost-saving for children undergoing chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). This strategy reduces infection rates and increases survival, offering a dominant approach over no prophylaxis.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Oncology
- Infectious Diseases
- Health Economics
Background:
- Infections are a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing leukemia treatment.
- Evaluating prophylactic antibiotics is crucial for improving outcomes in pediatric cancer patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin antibiotic prophylaxis versus no prophylaxis in children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Main Methods:
- A cost-utility analysis was performed from a single-payer healthcare system perspective over a lifetime horizon.
- A literature review informed a combined decision tree and state-transition model to evaluate outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and costs.
- Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the findings.
Main Results:
- Levofloxacin prophylaxis significantly reduced rates of fever and neutropenia (71.2% vs 82.1%) and bacteremia (21.9% vs 43.4%) compared to no prophylaxis.
- The analysis showed levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant, yielding cost savings of $542.44 and an increase of 0.13 QALY.
- Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant in 98.8% of iterations.
Conclusions:
- Levofloxacin prophylaxis is a cost-saving strategy for children receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML or relapsed ALL.
- This approach improves health outcomes and survival, making it a preferred option over no prophylaxis.
Background:
Infections are common and are a major cause of morbidity and mortality during treatment of childhood leukemia. We evaluated the cost effectiveness of levofloxacin antibiotic prophylaxis, compared to no prophylaxis, in children receiving chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).
Procedures:
A cost-utility analysis was conducted from the perspective of the single-payer health care system using a lifetime horizon. A comprehensive literature review identified available evidence for effectiveness, safety, costs of antibiotic prophylaxis in children with leukemia, and health utilities associated with the relevant health states. The effects of levofloxacin prophylaxis on health outcomes, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), and direct health costs were derived from a combined decision tree and state-transition model. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to test the sensitivity of results to parameter uncertainty.
Results:
The literature review revealed one randomized controlled trial on levofloxacin prophylaxis in childhood AML and relapsed ALL, by Alexander et al, that showed a significant reduction in rates of fever and neutropenia (71.2% vs 82.1%) and bacteremia (21.9% vs 43.4%) with levofloxacin compared to no prophylaxis. In our cost-utility analysis, levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant over no prophylaxis, resulting in cost savings of $542.44 and increased survival of 0.13 QALY. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, levofloxacin prophylaxis was dominant in 98.8% of iterations.
Conclusions:
The present analysis suggests that levofloxacin prophylaxis, compared to no prophylaxis, is cost saving in children receiving intensive chemotherapy for AML or relapsed ALL.
More Related Videos
06:14Optimized LC-MS/MS Method for the High-throughput Analysis of Clinical Samples of Ivacaftor, Its Major Metabolites, and Lumacaftor in Biological Fluids of Cystic Fibrosis Patients
Published on: October 15, 2017
09:09High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Excretion
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Distribution
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Overview and Drug Absorption