Establishment of Ph. Eur. Bordetella pertussis mouse antiserum Biological Reference Preparation batches 2, 3 and 4

A project aimed at establishing replacement batches for the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) Bordetella (B.) pertussis mouse antiserum was started in 2013 under the aegis of the Biological Standardisation Programme (BSP) of the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM). This BRP is used for the immunogenicity assay in mice to assess the potency of acellular pertussis (aP) vaccines as described in Ph. Eur. general method 2.7.16. Assay of pertussis vaccine (acellular). In a preliminary phase of the project (referred to herein as BSP129 phase 1) a hyper-immune serum pool was produced in mice using a combined aP vaccine as immunogen. This pool was used to generate 3 freeze-dried candidate (c) B. pertussis anti-mouse serum BRP batches (cBRP2, cBRP3 and cBRP4). After the pre-qualification that showed their suitability as candidate batches, an international collaborative study (BSP129 phase 2) was carried out in order to standardise these 3 batches against the current BRP1 in terms of anti-PT, -FHA, -PRN and -FIM2/3 antibody contents. For the sake of continuity with the standardisation of BRP1, the corresponding WHO standard (1RR 97/642) was introduced as a second reference for the calibration of the 3 candidate BRPs. Eleven laboratories took part in phase 2. Ten of them performed the ELISA method they use routinely for aP vaccine batch release and one laboratory performed the Multiplex Immunoassay (MIA) as an alternative test. Four participants titrated the antibodies against all 5 pertussis antigens, 5 participants determined the antibody content against 3 antigens (PT, FHA, PRN), one participant titrated the antibodies against PT and FHA antigens and one laboratory determined the antibody content for the PT antigen only. Details of all ELISA methods used were analysed to evaluate their impact on the calibration of the cBRPs. The variability of the results in relation to the nature and methodology of the tests appeared rather limited. Discrepant titres of cBRPs were measured depending on the reference used: the use of the 1RR induced an overestimation (in 8 out of 11 laboratories) and a large inter-laboratory variation in the calculated titres. Regardless of the reference used, equivalency between the calculated titres of cBRP2 and cBRP3 was observed, whilst cBRP4 had systematically lower titres for all antibodies against the 5 acellular pertussis vaccine components. Based on these observations, it was decided to establish the candidate BRP batches against BRP1 and to assign the following potencies based on the mean values determined through centrally calculated results of the calibration assays performed by ELISA in BSP129 phase 2: For cBRP2 and cBRP3 Anti-pertussis toxin: 37 ELISA Units (ELU) per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 114 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin: 44 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3): 25 ELU per vial For cBRP4 Anti-pertussis toxin: 32 ELU per vial Anti-filamentous haemagglutinin: 98 ELU per vial Anti-pertactin 38 ELU per vial Anti-fimbrial agglutinogens (FIM2/3):23 ELU per vial In February 2018, BRP2, BRP3 and BRP4 were adopted by correspondence by the Ph. Eur. Commission.