Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging01:19

Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging

173
DefinitionRenal angiography, also known as renal arteriography, is an imaging technique used to obtain a comprehensive view of blood flow and the vascular structure of blood vessels in the kidneys and surrounding areas.PurposeRenal angiography detects blood vessel abnormalities in the kidneys, such as aneurysms, stenosis, thrombosis, vascular tumors, and renal artery stenosis. It evaluates kidney function and guides interventional treatments like angioplasty or stent placement.Pre-Procedure...
173
Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging01:27

Imaging Studies IV: Magnetic Resonance Imaging

166
Introduction:Magnetic Resonance Imaging, or MRI, can include a specialized imaging technique of the urinary system known as Magnetic Resonance Urography (MRU). This radiation-free technique uses strong magnetic fields and radio waves to produce detailed images with the help of a computer. MRU is particularly effective for visualizing fluid-filled structures like the kidneys, ureters, and bladder.Applications of MRI in the Genitourinary SystemKidneys and Ureters: MRI detects tumors, cysts,...
166
Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography01:22

Imaging Studies V: Intravenous Urography and Retrograde Pyelography

705
IntroductionIntravenous Urography (IVU) and Retrograde Pyelography (RP) are important diagnostic imaging techniques used to evaluate the urinary system. These methods help identify structural abnormalities, obstructions, and functional issues in the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. Both procedures use iodine-based contrast media to enhance the visibility of urinary tract structures on X-ray images, though they differ in their methods and indications.1. Intravenous Urography (IVU)Intravenous...
705
Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography01:24

Imaging Studies II: Ultrasonography

198
IntroductionUltrasonography, or renal ultrasound, is a noninvasive medical imaging technique that uses high-frequency sound waves to visualize the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and surrounding tissues.Indications for Urinary System UltrasonographyUrinary system ultrasonography is indicated in various clinical scenarios, such as:Kidney Stones (Urolithiasis): To detect and monitor the size and presence of kidney or urinary tract stones.Hydronephrosis: To assess the dilation of the renal pelvis and...
198
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography01:27

Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

178
DefinitionComputed Tomography (CT) of the genitourinary (GU) tract is a non-invasive imaging modality that utilizes X-rays and computer processing to generate detailed cross-sectional images of the urinary system, encompassing the kidneys, ureters, bladder, and adjacent structures such as the adrenal glands.PurposeCT scans of the GU tract serve several diagnostic and therapeutic purposes, including:Diagnosis of Urinary Tract Diseases: Detects kidney stones, tumors, cysts, and congenital...
178
Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies01:28

Imaging Studies I: Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder Studies

148
Kidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) StudiesKidney, Ureter, and Bladder (KUB) studies are standard diagnostic imaging procedures used to assess the anatomy of the urinary system. They are commonly utilized for patients experiencing abdominal pain or urinary symptoms. By using a simple X-ray of the abdomen, KUB studies can reveal structural and pathological abnormalities within the kidneys, ureters, and bladder. These studies are particularly valuable in diagnosing kidney stones, urinary...
148

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging response assessment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a radiologist's guide to contemporary therapeutic strategies.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Image-guided percutaneous ablation techniques for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma: a primer for radiologists.

Abdominal radiology (New York)·2026
Same author

Generation of Automated Nephrometry Scores Through Direct Prediction of Each Component.

Urology·2026
Same author

Preoperative predictors of adverse pathology and recurrence-free survival for patients with renal masses.

BJUI compass·2026
Same author

Reply to "Follow-Up Requirements for 1- to 4-cm Indeterminate Adrenal Nodules: Aligning Data and Recommendations".

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2026
Same author

Prevalence of Malignancy Among Incidental Indeterminate Adrenal Nodules on Contrast-Enhanced CT in Patients Without Known Cancer: A Multiinstitutional Study.

AJR. American journal of roentgenology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
03:19

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.9K

Mimics and Pitfalls in Renal Imaging.

Erick M Remer1

  • 1Imaging Institute and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A21, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Radiologic Clinics of North America
|August 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Radiologists encounter pitfalls in kidney imaging interpretation, stemming from acquisition, patient factors, and image analysis. Accurately diagnosing fat-containing renal masses requires careful evaluation of fat patterns to avoid misinterpretation.

Keywords:
Fat-containing renal massPhase of contrast enhancementRegion of interestRenal pseudotumorTechnical pitfall

More Related Videos

Early Detection of Drug-Induced Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction Using Sonographic Technology in Rats
06:38

Early Detection of Drug-Induced Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction Using Sonographic Technology in Rats

Published on: March 11, 2016

12.4K
Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET
17:13

Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET

Published on: April 28, 2013

17.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography
03:19

Author Spotlight: Developing a Bedside Protocol for Kidney and Genitourinary Ultrasonography

Published on: June 21, 2024

1.9K
Early Detection of Drug-Induced Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction Using Sonographic Technology in Rats
06:38

Early Detection of Drug-Induced Renal Hemodynamic Dysfunction Using Sonographic Technology in Rats

Published on: March 11, 2016

12.4K
Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET
17:13

Non-invasive Imaging of Acute Allograft Rejection after Rat Renal Transplantation Using 18F-FDG PET

Published on: April 28, 2013

17.4K

Area of Science:

  • Radiology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Renal Pathology

Background:

  • Interpreting renal (kidney) imaging presents challenges for radiologists.
  • These challenges arise from various sources including image acquisition, patient-specific factors, and interpretation complexities.
  • Distinguishing benign findings from malignant tumors and accurately diagnosing fat-containing renal masses are common difficulties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline potential pitfalls in renal imaging interpretation for radiologists.
  • To categorize sources of diagnostic errors in kidney imaging.
  • To highlight challenges in evaluating enhancement patterns and fat-containing renal masses.

Main Methods:

  • Review of common interpretation errors in renal imaging.
  • Categorization of pitfalls based on origin: image acquisition, patient factors, and interpretation.
  • Discussion of specific challenges, including contrast enhancement assessment and analysis of fat within renal masses.

Main Results:

  • Pitfalls originate from imaging equipment, techniques, and patient conditions.
  • Interpretation challenges include assessing contrast enhancement and differentiating benign mimics from renal tumors.
  • Diagnosing fat-containing renal masses is complex due to discerning fat patterns.

Conclusions:

  • Awareness of acquisition and patient-related pitfalls is crucial for accurate renal imaging.
  • Careful evaluation of enhancement and benign mimics can prevent misdiagnosis.
  • Understanding fat patterns is essential for the correct diagnosis of fat-containing renal masses.