Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

317
Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
317
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management01:26

Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management

301
Patients with esophageal strictures often experience a range of symptoms. Initially, they may have difficulty swallowing solid foods, which can progress to include liquids. Additional symptoms may involve chest pain or discomfort, regurgitating food and fluids, heartburn, unintentional weight loss, coughing or choking during meals, and hoarseness.
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
301
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

367
Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
367
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management01:28

Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management

275
Esophageal varices often manifest as gastrointestinal bleeding episodes, presenting symptoms like hematemesis (vomiting of blood), hematochezia (passing fresh blood via the rectum), and melena (black, tarry stools). Other signs can include weight loss, anorexia, abdominal discomfort, jaundice, pruritus, altered mental status, and muscle cramps.
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...
275
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction01:30

Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction

440
Esophageal strictures involve abnormal narrowing or tightening of the esophagus. They vary in length and severity, ranging from mild constriction to complete obstruction, and are classified as benign (noncancerous) or malignant (cancerous).
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
440
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

295
Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
295

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Robot-Assisted Versus Video-Assisted Thymectomy: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.

European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery·2026
Same author

Comparison of long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and esophagectomy for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Gastroenterology report·2026
Same author

Integrative Multiomic Classification Reveals Distinct Origins and Evolutionary Trajectories of Thymic Epithelial Tumors.

Cancer research·2026
Same author

Lipid profiling in nontuberculous mycobacterial pulmonary disease based on geospatial locations and disease severity.

ERJ open research·2026
Same author

Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Cancers·2026
Same author

Spatial Transcriptomics Unveils Landscape of Resistance to Concurrent Chemo-Radiotherapy in Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The Role of SPP1<sup>+</sup> Macrophages.

Cancer medicine·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

14.5K

Current Issues in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Kwon Joong Na1, Chang Hyun Kang1

  • 1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

The Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|August 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) offers benefits for esophageal cancer treatment, including fewer complications and shorter hospital stays. This review examines current issues and evidence regarding conventional and robot-assisted MIE safety and efficacy.

Keywords:
Esophageal neoplasmLaparoscopyMinimally invasive surgical proceduresRobotic surgical proceduresThoracoscopy

More Related Videos

Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
09:04

Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.2K
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
04:05

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy

Published on: August 22, 2025

495

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
09:40

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function

Published on: April 17, 2020

14.5K
Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
09:04

Low-Cost Single-Port LoCoSP Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Published on: September 11, 2021

3.2K
Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy
04:05

Endoscopic Vacuum Therapy for the Treatment of Anastomotic Leakage after Total Gastrectomy with Esophagojejunostomy

Published on: August 22, 2025

495

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Oncology
  • Gastrointestinal Surgery
  • Minimally Invasive Procedures

Background:

  • Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) emerged in the 1990s.
  • MIE is now a standard treatment for esophageal cancer, recognized for oncological soundness.
  • Established benefits include reduced postoperative complications, shorter hospital stays, and improved quality of life compared to open surgery.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current literature on minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).
  • To discuss ongoing debates regarding the safety and efficacy of MIE.
  • To focus on issues related to conventional MIE and robot-assisted MIE.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of current scientific evidence.
  • Analysis of studies comparing MIE with open esophagectomy.
  • Examination of data on conventional versus robot-assisted MIE.

Main Results:

  • MIE is oncologically sound with documented advantages over open procedures.
  • Evidence supports reduced postoperative complications and hospital stays with MIE.
  • Ongoing discussions persist concerning the definitive safety and efficacy of MIE, particularly robot-assisted approaches.

Conclusions:

  • MIE is a widely accepted and beneficial approach for esophageal cancer.
  • Further research and discussion are needed to fully establish the safety and efficacy of MIE, including robot-assisted techniques.
  • The review highlights key areas of debate and evidence in MIE for esophageal cancer treatment.