Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving01:29

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Algorithms for Numerical Problem Solving

206
Mechanistic models play a crucial role in algorithms for numerical problem-solving, particularly in nonlinear mixed effects modeling (NMEM). These models aim to minimize specific objective functions by evaluating various parameter estimates, leading to the development of systematic algorithms. In some cases, linearization techniques approximate the model using linear equations.
In individual population analyses, different algorithms are employed, such as Cauchy's method, which uses a...
206
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

261
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
261
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis01:23

Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis

177
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
177

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effectiveness of pharmacy-based HIV pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis delivery: a cluster-randomized trial in Kenya.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Donor Urinary Biomarkers and the Prediction of Deceased Donor Allograft Function.

Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN·2026
Same author

Author Correction: Methodological considerations for evaluating policy impacts on transgender and non-binary youth suicidality.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Methodological considerations for evaluating policy impacts on transgender and non-binary youth suicidality.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Associations Between the Food Environment and Food Insecurity on Fruit, Vegetable, and Nutrient Intake, and Body Mass Index, Among Urban-Dwelling Latina Breast Cancer Survivors Participating in the <i>&iexcl;Mi Vida Saludable</i>! Trial.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Affective Neuropsychiatric Symptom Metrics in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Dataset.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K

Developing biomarker combinations in multicenter studies via direct maximization and penalization.

Allison Meisner1, Chirag R Parikh2, Kathleen F Kerr3

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|August 15, 2020
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a new method for developing biomarker combinations in multi-center studies, aiming to improve diagnostic and prognostic accuracy. Maximizing the center-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (aAUC) enhances predictive performance across diverse patient groups.

Keywords:
adjusted AUCbiomarker combinationsmulticenterpenalization

More Related Videos

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 12, 2025

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
07:35

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.9K
Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data
14:27

Identification of Disease-related Spatial Covariance Patterns using Neuroimaging Data

Published on: June 26, 2013

16.0K
Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
05:53

Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 21, 2018

10.5K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Biomarker Discovery
  • Clinical Research

Background:

  • Biomarker studies increasingly involve multi-center data.
  • Accurate diagnosis and prognosis are crucial in conditions like acute kidney injury.
  • Existing methods may not optimally leverage multi-center biomarker data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a novel method for constructing biomarker combinations in multi-center studies.
  • To directly optimize the center-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (aAUC).
  • To enhance biomarker performance and ensure consistency across different clinical centers.

Main Methods:

  • Direct maximization of the center-adjusted area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (aAUC).
  • Incorporation of penalization for variability in center-specific AUCs.
  • Demonstration of asymptotic properties and simulation studies for performance evaluation.

Main Results:

  • The proposed method, maximizing aAUC, shows improved performance in simulations.
  • Penalizing variability leads to biomarker combinations with consistent performance across centers.
  • Asymptotic properties of the developed combinations are theoretically demonstrated.

Conclusions:

  • Directly maximizing aAUC is an effective strategy for developing biomarker combinations in multi-center settings.
  • The method offers improved diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, particularly in acute kidney injury studies.
  • This approach provides a robust framework for biomarker development with enhanced cross-center generalizability.