Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

Three Different Protocols of Corneal Collagen Crosslinking in Keratoconus: Conventional, Accelerated and Iontophoresis
Published on: November 12, 2015
Accelerated Epi-On Versus Standard Epi-Off Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for Progressive Keratoconus in Pediatric
Maria A Henriquez1, Gustavo Hernandez-Sahagun, Jorge Camargo
1Research Department, Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, San Isidro, Lima, Perú.
Insights
Standard corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) was safer and more effective than accelerated transepithelial CXL in halting progressive keratoconus in children over 5 years. Both methods stopped disease progression, but epi-off CXL showed superior results.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
Background:
- Keratoconus (KC) is a progressive corneal ectasia often diagnosed in children and young adults.
- Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) is a standard treatment to halt KC progression.
- Newer accelerated transepithelial (A-epi-on) CXL techniques aim for improved patient comfort and shorter procedure times.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the 5-year efficacy and safety of accelerated transepithelial (A-epi-on) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) versus standard (epi-off) CXL in pediatric patients with progressive KC.
- To evaluate visual acuity, refractive outcomes, and corneal topography changes over a 5-year period.
Main Methods:
- A prospective cohort study involving 78 eyes of patients aged 18 or younger with progressive KC.
- Patients underwent either A-epi-on CXL (32 eyes) or standard epi-off CXL (46 eyes).
- Evaluations included best corrected visual acuity, refraction, and Scheimpflug imaging parameters at baseline, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively.
Main Results:
- Both A-epi-on and epi-off CXL halted KC progression at 5 years.
- Epi-off CXL demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in mean keratometry flattening (3.18 D, P < 0.001) compared to A-epi-on CXL (0.09 D, P = 0.33).
- The KC progression rate was 9.37% in the A-epi-on group, with no progression observed in the epi-off group.
Conclusions:
- Both accelerated transepithelial (A-epi-on) and standard (epi-off) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) effectively halt keratoconus progression in children over a 5-year period.
- Standard epi-off CXL proved to be safer and more effective than A-epi-on CXL in this pediatric cohort.
- Further research may explore optimized A-epi-on protocols to enhance its efficacy while maintaining patient comfort.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the 5-year efficacy and safety of accelerated transepithelial (A-epi-on) corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) with standard CXL (epi-off) in children with progressive keratoconus (KC).
Methods:
This prospective cohort study included 78 eyes of patients aged 18 years old or younger with progressive KC who underwent CXL at the Oftalmosalud Institute of Eyes, Lima, Peru. A-epi-on CXL was performed in 32 eyes (30' of impregnation/5' of irradiation at 18 mW/cm2) and epi-off CXL was performed in 46 eyes (30'of impregnation/30' minutes of irradiation at 3 mW/cm2). Visual acuity, refraction, and the Scheimpflug imaging parameters were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 and 5 years.
Results:
The best corrected visual acuity improved to 0.06 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (SD: 0.19, P = 0.03) and 0.09 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (SD: 0.13, P < 0.001) in the A-epi-on and epi-off groups, respectively. The mean flattening in the mean keratometry was 0.09 diopters (D) (SD: 0.68, P = 0.33) and 3.18 D (SD: 5.17, P < 0.001) in the A-epi-on CXL and Epi-off groups at the 5-year follow-up. Significant differences were found in the change at 1 and 5 years between the groups for cylinder reduction, flat and mean K, and pachymetry (all P < 0.05). The KC progression rate was 9.37% (3/32) in the A-epi-on CXL; no progression was found in the epi-off CXL group at the 5-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
Both procedures halted the progression of KC at the 5-year follow-up; however, epi-off CXL was safer and more effective when compared with A-epi-on CXL.
More Related Videos
12:25Second Harmonic Generation Signals in Rabbit Sclera As a Tool for Evaluation of Therapeutic Tissue Cross-linking TXL for Myopia
Published on: January 6, 2018
05:56Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...