Related Experiment Video
Updated: Dec 11, 2025

A New Method for Inducing a Depression-Like Behavior in Rats
Published on: February 22, 2018
Great Expectations: A Critical Review of and Suggestions for the Study of Reward Processing as a Cause and Predictor
Dylan M Nielson1, Hanna Keren1, Georgia O'Callaghan1
1Section on Clinical and Computational Psychiatry (CompΨ), National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Abstract:
Both human and animal studies support the relationship between depression and reward processing abnormalities, giving rise to the expectation that neural signals of these processes may serve as biomarkers or mechanistic treatment targets. Given the great promise of this research line, we scrutinized those findings and the theoretical claims that underlie them. To achieve this, we applied the framework provided by classical work on causality as well as contemporary approaches to prediction. We identified a number of conceptual, practical, and analytical challenges to this line of research and used a preregistered meta-analysis to quantify the longitudinal associations between reward processing abnormalities and depression. We also investigated the impact of measurement error on reported data. We found that reward processing abnormalities do not reach levels that would be useful for clinical prediction, yet the available evidence does not preclude a possible causal role in depression.
Related Concept Videos
Depression: Overview
Depressive Disorders: Etiology
Biological Factors in Depression
Biological predispositions significantly influence the risk of developing depressive disorders. Genetic studies highlight the role of variations in the serotonin transporter...

